Ultra Proxer — Recycled from Old zoom lens
Proxer is an old name to call Close-up lens which attach on front of the lens.
The lens I’m talking here is a front lens element I’ve scavenged from an old zoom lens 85~210 mm F 3.8, sold under many different names —– the photo was in the previous post (first photo, Front lens was near the left end).
Most of the close-up lens consist simple convex, single meniscus lens mounted on a filter frame. Same idea to put a magnifier before camera lens and take close-up photo. It was convenient to have a small adapter lens to take closer picture, as in the old days there was no such things like a macro setting on the Primary lens (Standard lens).
—– To make a high-performance Proxer, I did some cut and bonding works with epoxy glue, which was worthwhile to create a treasure out of junk. 🙂
Photo left : Don’t hesitate to hack-saw a lens barrel. Once disassembled and the glass was removed, even a precision optical device, is a piece of metal. = What it used to be is only in your mind. On this moment you are dealing the work to create something new. What required here is a careful but very simple and boring push and pull work. 😀
Center photo : To the front lens, hack-sawed front barrel (which got 58mm filter screw ) was screwed back and a filter ring was bonded to its rear side with epoxy glue.
Photo right : The finished close-up lend was attached on the front of the Canon EF 100 mm Macro lens, which also has 58 mm filter size.
You might be wondering, while having macro lens already, and having a skill to use the lens in reverse etc. = all sorts of close-up trick, why do I need to have yet another close-up lens. —– well, all of my Macro lenses were down to the life-size, in other words, they take a picture of 36mm x 24mm is the closest. I simply wanted to close a bit more. (My attention tend to go rather small things. 🙂 )
—– And a real intention was to have much more exaggerated out of focus Bokhe. (I’m tired with clear images which is everywhere and too easy to come by today.)
Photo left : With this close-up lens, when the master lens, 100 mm Macro lens was set to the infinity, a small dole (36 mm tall) looks like this. (taken F 2.8)
Center Photo : With close-up lens, when the Master Macro lens was set to the life-size, it produces x2 larger image (dole’s head is 10mm). Have look the Bokhe in F 2.8 = max open). (This Bokhe is quite close to the Olympus Zuiko 50 mm F 2 Macro lens ! )
Photo right : A small beetle who happen to came to my room (it’s too hot these days, the window was fully open) this photo was taken with a bounced flash-light with F 11.
Unlike most of the Proxer, this home-made close-up lens has double lens chromatic structure, and fully coated. = Think, a cost of common cheap Proxer, and a Front lens which is the most crucial part of the lens structure in a zoom lens.
= Difference of quality is obvious. As you can see it in those sample photos.
A photo of a moth parched on the wall in my room, taken by EF 100 mm Macro with the handmade Proxer. = With F 2.8 the depth of focus is really shallow still, in the focused area, the image is very sharp.
This is a test shot of the screen of a Tablet (a photo of my umbrella). This close-up lens maintained very high quality of the image = Very even, corner to corner. And this is at F 2.8 ! (See details, by click it, and again)
Left photo is Macro lens alone and about 1/2 size. Right photo is, with close-up lens but Master lens was set to Infinity. Hence this combination can take photo from infinity to 1/1 and with this Proxer to x2. (By the way, Canon 5D mk-III has dreadful red-color cast when ISO was set to 6400. In AWB and in any setting. Though, at ISO 100 much better. = See the photos below)
(Photo left : 5D but Mk-II. Photo Right : The ISO setting was 100 = Much better !)(Those are hand-held photos = only for Color reference.) To be fair, I show you the photos by Nikon D810’s color in similar setting.
(Photo Left : Nikon D810 — ISO 3600 Photo Right : Same but ISO 100 Both with Micro Nikkor 55mm F3.5 — 1/2 )
Higher ISO setting mean, very low out-put of image sensor has to be amplified electronically to its limit. While amplifying to such extent, still linearity has to be maintained, while the out-put of each BGR may not having exactly the same character.
= Can of warm is opened. 🙂 In the same time, higher amplification also amplify the noise as well.
—– I admire and praise the people who managed it and brought the benefit of very high ISO setting even if it was not (yet) perfect.
[]
The last two pictures are very strange, and good ones. Special ones. Supermacro..
Thank you very much Bente.
That was what I worked for —– and your word meant to me that my effort was not in vain !
(Soft focus, pinhole, etc. all in the same context.)
Your technical process is astonishing Yoshi! And the shots are gorgeous.
Thank you Elena.
I know a little bit, hence I was an adviser to the Canon when they were designing EOS-1 as
a rare breed of a photographer, knowing the technology as well.
I hope you like the photos in the next post. 😉
[…] not close enough. So that I specially made additional Proxer / Close-up lens my self. […]
Wow, you are so creative (brave)! As are those last 2 images. I love the softness of them and especially the composition of the yellow flower.
Thank you Karen.
I’m not sure if I were anything brave since there was no danger or loose anything.
[…] Lest of photos were taken by Canon EF Macro 100mm F2.8 with Close-up lens. […]
[…] you may visit the old posts. Here and There. […]
[…] I made close-up lens out of a front element of the zoom lenses. So, I wanted to make something different from this Nikon zoom lens. (AF-S Nikkor 18~200 G ED) […]
[…] that it was not because of the VR but the shatter makes very little vibration and the lens I used (Canon 100mm macro F2.8 with proxer) happen to be very solid and steady even for handheld […]