OM Cap

Some post ago I mentioned that the lens and body cap of Olympus
OM can fit to the other cameras. A very funny story behind was,
since I needed a body cap of Micro 4/3rd camera as I wanted to make
a lens for M4/3 camera (MD-E). I ordered it through eBay, as I found
one bender is selling the lens and body caps together for £0.99 !
While I was waiting the cap arrive here, I changed Olympus MD-E to
Sony A7R = since, compare to 10 mm x 16 mm M4/3 image sensor, A7R
got 35mm full size. Why settle with tiny toy. — Then, I realized
that the body (and lens) cap I received was not for M4/3 camera but
out-dated OM (film camera’s) = “A’ha that’s why it was so cheap”
This could be a serious trouble though, before I start to complain to
the bender, I found that the OM cap can fit to the latest Sony
E-mount body / A7. (Anyway, on that moment I no longer had
Olympus but Sony. )
.
The three caps on the first shopping run out soon to make yet another
Pinhole Machine and Toy camera lens.
Therefore, I re-ordered to the same bender yet more three caps.
—– And, I waited, and waited while having quite hi-tension because,
the bender might have noticed that he (she ?) made a mistake and would
send me M4/3 cap instead, it means I may need to buy E-mount cap while
paying 4 times more money. But, I received the old OM caps again ! 🙂

I’ve tested few plans to make other strange optics etc to use those
lens caps. In fact, I got the M42 to E-mount adapter for the same
purpose still, they are more expensive and awkward to work with.
— anyway, back to the funny story, = I still don’t know whether
the bender was knowingly selling OM cap as the M4/3 cap or
honestly believing that was M4/3 cap.
What so ever, I was lucky to have this mishup — and that’s why
on the postal package, the Omen of that number appeared.
(on the top photo, in the red circle = 1085 ) 😀
.
Tim Lewis exhibition

Last night there was an opening PV of Tim Lewis exhibition at the
Flowers gallery, Cork street, London.

Despite the kinetics is rather odd in the art world, quite a number
of visitors filled the floor and they were curious to touch and rotate
the gear —– and amazed to see how the things move. 🙂

Some of his creations are pretty small but, some are big.
Still overall concept is always the same, like grand dad made
a toy for a small boy. In the digital techno age, his creation
stays stubbornly analog and rather rustic and moves purely
for the sake of move.
Normally, the things move for the purpose of something
= (nature or economics never waste the energy)
car moves, in order to take the driver or passenger A to B.
The machines do their works. Apple had to drop because the
gravity pulled him. But Tim’s Machine moves only to show
its movement. That’s all. They were made just for the art.
= So, the visitors seems not a kind of Geek or Otaku.


The exhibition was addressed by the curator, Ann Elliot who
saw “His work is beautiful” but only wonder the mechanics.
(Photo above, from left = James (gallery director) Ann and Tim)


Tim (photo middle) and his kids playing with Dady’s toy !
(I would say, he must be much happier than playing with Pokemon.) 😀


People kept talking and talking — even outside (it was a hot day) 🙂
—– The most of the photos here were taken by the Pinhole, either with or
without Fisheye adapter.
Sharper photo was made by a Hand made Toy lens on Sony A7R camera.
Covent Garden (2) (by the Lens)

All the photos in this post were taken by, most of them were by
the 18mm Zeiss Distagon for Nikon, on D810. But few of them
were by the Homemade Toy Camera Lens on the Sony A7R.

Covent Garden IS the place the most changed its guise in London.
When I came to London, here was a vegetable market. Still, for the
planned move of the market, some businesses were started to move.
When the wholesale market kind of business moves, they leave
huge stock space behind.
Then, the people who needs huge space moved in. = Photo studio kind.
And the related business, such as film processing etc. =
That’s how I came here = to have my E6 film developed.




What a bad taste. Is this what they call Spiritualism ? ? ?




Simply because of a Film, My fair Lady (Audley Hepburn’s Flower girl !)
the tourists started to come Covent Garden, so, the area has been changed
to a “Fashionable Tourists Place” —– still, it’s interesting to see why the
area attracted occult / spiritual shop = quite few of them are here.

In 1974 (?) probably the first vegetarian restaurant in central London
“Food for thought” opened here. (I was taken there by a vegetarian
friend who does the Buddhists Meditation)
(thence, he started to have the troubles on his leg).
—– it was a well-known story, that the all the High Priests
of Zen end up on wheel chair.
Gautama Buddha left a rank of hard astir monk, thinking that to
torturing the body wouldn’t bring any High Awareness to him.
(But, my friend didn’t convince and said, that the trouble on his leg
was nothing to do with Zen practice, instead, need more effort for
the meditation to save his life.) ! ! !
So, may be those stubborn vegetarianism was the origin of
“Spiritual Covent Garden” (Food for Thought twisted the belief ! )
And a corner of the Covent Garden, Neals Yard became a holy place
for the vegetarian. — By the way, vegetarianism came from Hindu.
Lord Buddha eat anything offered and died for food poisoning of fish.
Buddhism doesn’t have such arrogance, “Killing the plant is OK”.
Killing and eating animals, plants are part of unavoidable Karma.













Round the corner, two pictures above, were in fact, China Town.
.
Covent Garden (1)

I had some shooting around Covent Garden with a friend who
also got pinhole on his Alpha 7-II camera.
(But a photo here on top was a comparison, shot by Nikon
D810 with Zeiss 18mm lens.)

The same objects by the pinhole on A7R camera.

And so on.












Whether you like those moody image or not. 😀
.
A7 doing Good Job or just Meddling too much ?

Quite a while, time to time (I don’t remember how many years)
I’ve been taking picture of the sky from my window. Naturally, its
looks changes season to season, and it’s not necessary a dramatic
beautiful sky. It’s just a sky.

As I don’t go out for drinking or look for a bottom of the girls,
watching the sky is a healthy alternative (and cost nothing.) 😀

Not just watching but taking photo mean, by a camera.
So that, my Nikon with 18mm Zeiss lens has been a fixture on front
of the window quite a while. And, — as I got Sony A7 and the adapter
to fit a Nikon lens to its E-Mount, I tested its 18mm lens on the A7 body.
—– though, the sky over dence leafy tree is a very contrasty image =
to the SONY camera. (Canon 5D or Nikon D810 just take as it IS)
But, A7 is keep meddling (— are they try to brighten the dark shadow
of the tree ? — how do they know what image I want to have !)
DO they believe that they can make it for ME ? — how patronizing.
— should I say,”Thank you very much” OR “Silly YOU, stop it” 😦
* * * * *

Exactly the same trend to “Smart Phone” with hundreds of the
Fancy App, Sony can do many tricks, such as the Panorama here.
(Above was a part of 18mm — 360 degree Panorama
— in my kitchen) 😀

And this was a Panorama made by a 16mm Nikon Fisheye lens
(vertical line shows no distortion !)
— may be a fun to some user though, I’m very sceptic to those
too much Digital intervention. It’s rather spoils the spirit of
the Photography than enhance it. Spending more time gazing
at the PC screen, than to stand against the subject = we are
going into more and more virtual environment and
losing the real touch of the life.
—– And to the camera company themselves, = if the digitally
stiched-up photo is good enough, who need to buy expensive
wide-angle lens ?
.
Photographer’s Gallery

Probably the most well-known iconic figure in the Photographer’s Gallery
must be the guy always sitting there, Alan. —– In this occasion, he was
captured by the Toy camera lens, costed less than £2. —– Still,
considering its humble origin, the photo here wasn’t too bad, isn’t it ?
Or, I would say, the quality and the quite present softness is superb.
(Did you noticed, there was no focused point or depth of field kind
on the picture = because the lens was omnifocas.)
(And, did you see the man’s face, he was not smiling. If you thought
otherwise, your eyes are not seeing reality of the life. Look again.)

But, rest of the images here were taken by my Pinhole-machine. 😀


About the info’ of what they are doing now = please see their website.
This is not a journalistic report but the shadow, what I saw there
and how I reacted.









MMMMMMMMMMM (sometime, I keep my mouth shut)
😀
.
Useless Information (?)

Image here was made by a Tri-color Pinhole which I could mount on
the A7 camera through Nikon to EOS and EOS to E-mount adapter.
(What a hustle ! = I’ll tell you later.)
During all those hustle, what I found were — (though they may not
necessary useful to you.) 😀

1) You can use Pentax-K lens cap on Nikon lens. (Photo Left)
2) Likewise, the same Pentax-K lens cap will fit to the Sony
E-mount lens. (Photo Middle)
3) Sony E-mount body cap will fit to the Nikon body. (Photo Right)

4) The adapter, EOS to E mount I got from Ebay (about £5 or so) had
a trouble — as bayonet spring was too wide and obstructing the lens
bottom goes into = I needed to file-down the width of those 3 springs
(where I marked in Red on the photo Right = see enlarged)

(Photo shows the bayonet spring and a broken hence replaced screw)
= If you found the same trouble, you need to do the same — or buy
another, more expensive one. (So, they changed the price to £7.xx) 😀
(Think, why it was cheap = being defective, it became a deadstock and
sold as a scrap. Then, Chinese guy made a Net business to sell away
= how many customers sending back and claim a money back which
would cost more, and the address may not even existed.) 😀
The funny story was, as I put negative feedback on ebay, the seller
contacted me saying if I change the feedback to positive,they will
refund me, so I replied them “As this blog explained, I’ve modified
its defect and now I’m using it, therefore no need of refund, still,
the fact remain I wouldn’t change the negative feedback” —
then, they send me yet another mail
“We will send you £2, so change the feed back to positive” =
Are they thinking that they can buy me £2 ! = What a mentality !
Is this a norm in China ? horrifying isn’t it !
To see the situation, I gave a through check of those adapters.

(To be fair, I obtained even one more EOS-NEX adapter)

In order to make a bayonet fixing tight enough= not clutter,
still smooth enough to dismount, the spring was used beneath
the craw (such as the one I’ve shown few picture before with
red mark), other cheaper alternative is to make a slit in the
claw (Photo above Left = yellow marked) and make the slit
bend to give some flexibility. Though, the other EOS-NEX
adapter showed funny character = Canon’s EFS (plastic mount)
could be mounted but metal mount thousand pound lens couldn’t.
Because the adapter’s female claw was too thick. ==> I needed
to file down the claws thinner. (Photo Right — with blue color
marker = it’s easy to see where I do need to cut !)
(It’s funny to discover, that the Canon is making their
cheap EFS lens mount even thinner and loose.)

5) Nikon G to EOS adapter sold on the Net, the rotating lever may be
too long and stack with the lens bottom. So that, if you found the sign
of such symptom, DON’T mount the lens to EOS with such adapter.
You need to file-down the tip of the lever (marked in Red in the
photo above) a bit shorter, and make sure the lever moves freely.


So, — after I’ve sorted out those troubles, I could mount my
Tri-color Pinhole (here, Pink, Yellow, Sky) to the A7 body.
( Then after thought, I should make another one for A7, since an
Olympus body cap which is fit to A7 is £0.99 and etc is free, but
the use of those adapter which is costing £5, £10 makes no sense.)

And, this was the photo of, now rather familiar view — by
the Zeiss Distagon 18mm, designed for Nikon mount.
—– A nightmare of the mount adapter IS = once the lens stack
to the body, there is no way else other than to destroy the lens.
(Pull-off the screws, fixed to the mount with sheer force or hack-saw
the lens bottom while showering the camera with saw dust.)
Is it funny ?
.
PS : If you are looking for the Body Cap for Sony NEX mount to use
for a Pinhole experiment etc. or just for body cover, now in the Ebay
you can find the pair of E-mount (NEX) Rear Lens Cap + Body Cap
for £0.99 —– you don’t need to hastle finding out OM cap. 🙂
.
.
Pinhole Machine for A7R

While having Olympus OM body cap handy, which happen to be a
perfect fit to Sony A7, E-Mount, I could easily make a Pinhole System.
= With or without Fisheye effect and the choice of Single Pinhole or
Double Density Pinhole. (So, I can do it in the industrial scale !)

Other than a strange color hue on the peripheral, the pinhole shot was
well-managed by the camera’s AUTO setting = Automatically chosen
ISO 6,400. Just aim and click. Single Pinhole, Photo above left.
Double Density Pinhole, Photo right.

And a Mob-phone-camera Fisheye adapter was attached with.
(Since, Foster beer can run out, this time the Pinholes were made
on a Danish variety. (Photo Top, Right) 😀
I think, its looks, works pretty good.
* * * * *
Again, to be fair to the paying customers, this is the real staff
Canon Fisheye (Zoom 8~15mm). With a help of just arrived EF
to E-mount adapter. —– See the dimensional difference.
(A7 camera’s Focus-peeking worked very well = able to show
the difference of 10cm on the 15mm image was remarkable !)
= definitely, miles better than my eye-sight ! 
—– Though, am I going to use the Alpha 7 in this way is quite
questionable. So far, I found the use of the A7 with the Homemade
Toy lens, and the Pinhole machine is very handy and comfortable.
In addition, I might use A7 for Digitizing the Transparency and
make another tilting bellows to take advantage of the
A7 camera’s 18mm flange-back.
(Use 35mm film camera’s lens, it can focus from infinity.)
.
Fun lens on the Alpha 7R

Picture here is a kind, nobody would be impressed, still nobody
would complain kind. It was made by a lens of rather humble origin,
came from discarded toy camera. —– Considering it’s utterly cheap
existence (two plastic lenses structure) the picture isn’t too bad at all.
On the time, people see the picture on the 5″x3″ chemist print,
this kind of quality was perfectly acceptable.

In fact, I’ve talked about this lens, few post ago.

And now, the lens has been properly (in certain extent 😀 )
re-structured for Alpha 7 camera. (Beautiful isn’t it ?) Ha ha ha.
(So, the lens can take landscape to portrait without refocusing
or change F-aperture kind = anyhow, no controls here at all.)

Only the trouble I found with this combination was = mysterious
blurred image they makes. It was under a blight day light.
The AUTO setting on the camera, A7R chose ISO 1600 and
shutter speed was 1/160.

Why the picture was blurred ? — I set up a tripod (not a heavy weight,
still proper Gizzo tripod) — strangely, still the picture was blurred.
It was nothing but a mystery. (Obviously, I need to test further though,
at moment, this IS a lens (other than Pinhole) I got for this camera.
(I’m waiting to receive lens adapter for this camera.) — Whether this
body got a resonance to 1/160 shutter vibration, or the camera activating
other function to cause adverse effect ? = So, I tested the camera on
manual setting : ISO 3200-1/320, ISO 1600-1/160, ISO 800-1/80,
ISO 400-1/40, ISO 200-1/20. Iso 100-1/10, Iso 50-1/5. All hand-held.

ISO 3200 – 1/320

ISO 50 – 1/5
Those photos above were the shot on the test. Non of them
showed heavy blur = it seems, the AUTO and 1/160 combination did
the Blurring business. 😀 — on the AUTO setting, other function
of which I’m not fully understood the implication, meddling in.
(Such as when the A7 thought, the image is too high contrast, the
automatic HDR operation comes in = gives three consecutive
exposures = unexpected hand may not keep still.)
I guess, something adverse effect of AUTO might have had happened.
It’s still a mystery Sir.
* * * * *
To be fair to a Paying Customer, this is the quality if you pay the price.

This photo was taken by Canon EF 40mm F2.8 on 5D Mk-III
— can you see the difference ? (It’s costing £100 more.)
.
Southbank by Gaudy Lens (2)

Previous post was about the people, here the landscape. 😀









You might say “Those people in the picture, aren’t they the people ?”
“Are they ?
I thought, they were the well made stones. Just happen to be there.”
Survive well in such heat wave.
.
leave a comment