Why Practice ?
Once Master Dogen wrote ” If we were born with the Dharma, why all the
Holy Masters in the history needed to practice hard to attain Enlightenment ?”
——-well, he was young then.
Has been born with Dharma, but to able to see it, is the different matter.
We still need to practice to eliminate all sorts of destructive delusions and
thoughts, in order to see invisible Dharma.
——-in here, me to use the word ” see ” was a metaphor.
We never able to see the Dharma itself. Like the gravity, we see
an apple falling but not the gravity itself. What we can see is only in
its effect, as a revelation.
So far, what I found other than intricacy of the existences but something
peculiar is, when something completely out of blue, with a sheer coincidence,
yet still it could affect one’s life has happened, I believe it is an
intervention of the Dharma.
——– If you reading this just by chance, you to encounter this, could be
the intervention of the Dharma, by which you might have crucial study
of the Buddhism by seeing the Truth, otherwise a sample of sheer Misunderstanding.
( which ever the case you may find)
———————
Me to start this blog site was a pure coincidence.
I didn’t have such intention at all.
On the beginning, I met a man working for BBC at an art exhibition , who
suggested me to see a Buddhist blog site which I did..
And, in order to put my comment, I needed to register to the WordPress.
By doing so just lightheartedly, my blog site was created in the same time.
( I don’t have web-site to publicize, and never joined Facebook, Myspace
kind of SNS, even though I was a well known photographer before)
Once it was created, I have to take care of it in my best.
What ever happened or who ever comes, I have to deal with it as a duty
without any thought, since it was not my plan, but it was given.
As I don’t think about too much to start, neither think about its
consequence. Since it was given by the Dharma, it must be a
part of my fate.
So that, if its turned out to be good, Congratulation, if not, cry.
( But so far I only having had very interesting kind of life, without getting
any ill / I still don’t have GP even after 34 years in England. —–whether
it was thanks to the Buddhism or just lucky, I don’t know, neither care )
—— In this aspect, Buddhist is a fatalist (or at least I am )
Who is Yoshizen?

I’ve born in a Zen temple, as my farther happen to be a priest there, though I’m not a
monk yet, since I still have a lots of hair on the top.
Ha Ha Ha.
Before I left Japan, I spent a time in the Eihei-ji Tmple, where Master Kogetsu sentenced me
“You never get enlightenment, since you know too much which keep you
away from the Enlightenment”——it was nearly 40 years ago.
Yet still, I used my damned knowledge, science, history of human evolution,
neuroscience, psychology, etc, above all common sense, to evaluate Zen phenomenon,
while actually testing the many different practices and body action.
My question was, What is Zen, and why and how the Zen created and shaped the human
activity, such as Ethics, Tea ceremony, Martial art— down to all aspects of daily life
(of Japanese especially). And I went back to the most likely original form of the
Lord Buddha’s teachings, not necessary from the Scriptures which seems to be heavily
re-written for the sake of glorifying the Lord Buddha,
but followed the likely psyche of the Lord Buddha himself then.
The best sample is, whether the Spirit remain after a person’s death and the Heaven or
Hell exist ? — When the Disciples asked this question, the Lord Buddha said to be kept silent.
Such an enlightened man who dare to utter, “The life is to get ill, suffering, get old and die”
could mislead the followers by giving an illusion of the paradise ? ——- I don’t think so.
(The idea of the Mahayana Buddhism, the Heaven, the Savior, the Supreme God, came from
the influence of the teachings of a Christian Apostle Tomas who came to the southern India
and built / opened number of churches 2000 years ago, not from the Brahmanism / Hinduism.)
If the Lord Buddha could accept the idea of perpetual sou Atomanl, which is the idea of Brahmanism,
he could choose to be a Brahman high priest as he was the Royal Prince.
Since he rejected Brahmanism and the existence of perpetual soul or reincarnation, while saying
“When you die, it will be the end of all the sufferings, this is the Nirvana”,
it was really the revolutionary idea then.
—–To be continued—–
( this is the first time I ever expressed my view of the Buddhism in a public arena
and I would like to hear what you say)
leave a comment