Pear Skin
In this post, I’m talking about completely different several topics.
To start, all of those are the photos of peeled skin of a pear.
— peeled and dried skin. The photo, top photo was taken by
the 4th version of Double-Density Pinhole. (Shutter speed was 1/30th)
And this photo was taken by the Two Elements Homemade Lens.
(Equivalent of F4.5 and 1/250th)
Then this is the normal kind of photo taken by the Canon EF 40 mm F2.8.
(at F11 and 1/100th) Something special was that all those three photos
were taken on the ISO 25,600 setting ! —– Even with such high ISO setting,
the color and the smooth tonal character wasn’t too bad though, very peculiar
point was that the rough grain appeared only on the top (pinhole) photo.
= a sort of common knowledge, the rough grain appears on high ISO setting
= if that was the case, why other two photos doesn’t show the grain at all ? ? ?
The another matter here was,
why drying the fruits peel ?
Well, in order to prevent the fruits Fly
appear, I decided not to make a wet
garbage in a bin, but first dry them
spread next to the window.
(Fly doesn’t come to the exposed, half dry skin)
Once, fruits skin, orange peel etc were dried, they never attract fly = it’s mean
there wouldn’t be any conflict. (may looks a bit messy though, nobody sees it.)
I think this is the Buddhist like solution — remove the cause, resulting no conflict,
fight or killing = What a peaceful solution. Don’t you agree ? 🙂
[]
Yet more Impressionists Photos (2)-B
With much of annoyance of the regular reader, I put yet another
fuzzy pictures — but with added “academic” ( 🙂 ) interest !
The pinhole which I’ve called 3rd version, used in the previous post
and “Quest for Fuzziness” post etc was the one gone too far, hence the
image has very little informations.
So, I made the 4th version which gives less halation and a bit sharper image.
(outer hole is still the same 1 mm though, the inner hole was much smaller.)
So, here is a comparison. (Photo above was by the 4th version)
And this was taken by the 3rd version. = Difference is too clear.
Those white halation can be reduced by darkening (shadowing) though,
by doing so, the color contrast also increase = higher color saturation.
This was the reason why the images in the previous post looked like
a copy of old cine-film. (It is a contradiction, supporsed to be a soft image
end up with strong color. 😦 )
Outer 1 mm hole was made on the thin aluminium panel (from beer can)
though, the inner pinhole was made on the thin plastic (from a cap of yogurt)
therefore it is very easy to make another one in 10 seconds,
and thanks to the DSLR, the effect can be tested at once.
So, the Pinhole photography suits for a DSLR camera and really a fun. 🙂
(Especially in the case of Canon DSLR —–
Nikon needs to have Non-CPU lens set-up. (See the end of the Post)
—– I haven’t tested with other camera though)
[]
Yet more Impressionists Photos (2)-A
The pictures in this post were also taken by the 3rd version of
Concentric Double Density Pinhole which was the same one I used
for the previous post. And the one giving the most drastic Bokhe.
Outer hole is 1 mm though the center Pinhole was comparatively large and
the material filling the gap is rather clear plastic. (it was a cap of yogurt . 🙂 )
So that, it wouldn’t give so much details of the subject.
So to say, they are somewhat the equivalent of rough oil paintings by large blush.
So, the use of this Pinhole is a matter of the taste and the subject.
= Sometime it creates nice picture but not always. 😀
[]
Yet more Impressionists Photos (1)
I guess, to the regular reader who followed past few posts, those photos must be
looks very familiar. Yes, they were taken by the Concentric Double Density
Pinhole but this time it was by the (say) 4th model. (In fact I don’t know
whether it was 10th or 20th —– I’ve tried so many minute variations.)
Still, this time the diameter of outer hole was smallest 1 mm and the image was
a bit sharper than the one on the post “Quest for Fuzziness” 🙂
They may looks the same though, where “Fuzzy enough, but still show
the identity of what” lies somewhat critical. 😀
When the picture become more and more like a painting, it’s need to
have “likely stage-up” — like this picture, it may need to have
a man and the dogs (if not a peasant) near the foreground. 🙂
[]
Greenwich Park — and the Flowers
Next to the the pond, a patch of meadow (?) was created —– quite colorful
though, they were not a kind of seedling plants, so it may not for the
birds but purely for ornamental purpose, I think.
Again this is the gorgeous set up for the fuzzy images.
No decent subtleness here, just an orgy of rampant color !
Densely planted flower circle prevented me to see or take picture
in close proximity —– I have no idea what this flower was.
Still, I like this flowers attitude “Standing out, firm” 🙂
In fact, this is the outside of the park = a corner of Blackheath.
This is a puzzling field. If it was in Spain, it would be a Campo de Faria kind
though I never seen such things there. The place was left as if nobody want to
touch. —– someone said, it was a mass-grave for the Black Death time,
hence the name Blackheath. —– Quite convincing.
[]
Greenwich Park Flowers
As the instant flower meadow was gone, I took a journey to
Greenwich Park where ample supply of flowers there.
Those close-up photos following here were taken without the Front Lens.
(It’s mean, just a lens from toy camera)
In contrast to the almost pan-focus image of Retro-focus two element Lens,
this lens from toy camera shows very clear depth of field and out of focus Bokhe !
Isn’t this Bokhe, fantastic ! 🙂
The park got a lots of Cosmos though, they are a dwarf type
= grow only to 1~1.5′ tall.
—– or, Greenwich Park might be keeping the old taste (to grow Cosmos) 🙂
As a park garden, the flowers here were well kept in order !
It’s mean, when flower was finished, they will be replaced by the other flower.
So the order here was kept by the strict regime.
No luxury to yield a seeds.
—– though, it’s hard to say, otherwise, grown to be eaten, which life is better ?
(So called Human is not necessary acting Humanely = pulled flowers straight
to the compost = buried alive and leave them to rotten ! = hersh isn’t it ? )
[]
End of Summer Meadow
Since, the time of growth and flowering has more or less finished.
= for that flower patch it was not an exception. After some strong
wind and the rain, now the meadow is in their closing stage.
On the other hand, now I got proper front lens for that Homemade
two elements Lens thanks to the kind assistance of HOYA Optics.
(Original lens came from my broken specs and -5 Diopter strength.
Now I got -3 and -6 for further experiment. (I would have -3, -6, -9 to test !)
Unlike 25 year old specs lens, brand new lens is much clearer = less fuzziness.
To compensates clearer image, I increased the “F-Aperture” somewhat
one-stop (6 mm to 10 mm) = it affected the depth of field as well. 😦
Still, they looks more or less the same 😀
Only (used to be) the meadow looks different. After a Riot, there
would be inevitable dead bodies and the dried-up carcasses and sticks.
That’s what we human saw the situation though, for the flowers
themselves, looks like a dried-up carcass is their very seed pod etc
= their proof of success in this summer’s operation.
Don’t make up a drama, it is just another phase of one cycle.
I’m not sure whether they will come back next season. —– Just wait and see.
Anyhow, I was very much fired-up by their chaos.
(And created lords of looks more or less the same picture. 😀 😀 )
Still it was a fun !
[]
Riot of Flowers (2)
As a post uploaded week ago had a title Riot of Flower (1),
this is the following one (2) 🙂 All the photos I took at the same time, looks
more or less the same, (and so many) I’m not sure whether it has been
uploaded already in different hue and trimming. 😀
—– never mind they are just a lots of flowers.
(On the process to upload here, the file of photos had been cut down from
5~10M to 500K or so, though the program seemed no good for fuzzy image
= they became awful = so please use your imagination. 😀
(they seemed better and smoother on Android tablet screen.)
(Lens used and the camera was the same as before.)
[]













































































































4 comments