Sky-Pink-Orange Tri-Pinhole Pictures (2)
If you are tired to see this kind of looks all same images, I should say sorry
but still, I would put you into misery few more times.
In here those Tri-color pictures, the trouble of Orange color in the previous post
has been sorted out and the position of Blue and Orange were swapped.
As its character, Tri-color Pinhole images are inherently gorgeous.
It makes one flower suddenly trebled and put a color to each one.
—– How marbelous. 😀
As I’ve explained in the previous post, those exaggerated color was not made by
any fancy program but by just darken and brighten several times that all.
(with an adjustment of Wammer — Cooler color a bit)
For me it’s a fun.
Pale Blue-Pale Red and Yellow Tri-color Pinhole Pictures
The previous post [Blue-Orange-Red Tri-color ] was obviously too reddish.
Yes, Red + Orange was too strong indeed.
So, I tried Pale Blue (Sky), Pale Red (Pink) and Yellow next.
Though, the effect of Yellow was rather weak —
It gave only a bit warmer color-temperature.
Then I realized that the pinhole for Yellow was not clean round hole. (too late)
Still, end results weren’t too bad.
(But I need yet another try.)
[]
Blue-Orange-Red Tri-color Pinhole Pictures
Who said, Tri-color is BGR. —– Tri-color on the French Frag are Blue, Red, White.
Any three colors can be Tri-color. Why not 🙂
BGR tri-color images on the previous post looks too cold. I want warmer image.
(I tested with Green, Red, Yellow though, it looks still too cool.)
So, I put Blue, Orange, Red. —– Images looks on fire. I like it. 😀
Mind you, not all the Zennist is pale-faced cool person. I’m not cool at all. 😀
In fact, only white flower would be rendered into those colors.
(Flower can keep their own color — more or less.)
I think, direct sun light hitting the pinholes caused those red halation.
Anyhow, it’s a burning color in deed. (Is there anything wrong ?)
[]
仏教の行と大脳生理 (Effects of Practice)
(This is the Japanese version of previous post = Key Mechanism in Zen Buddhists Mind and in its brain function.)
ここまでのいくつかのポストで,原始仏典のアーガマ(阿含)経から大乗仏典のほとんど全てに至る
までがいかにヒンズー教に書変えられていたかを書きましたが,
それにもかかわらずいったいどのようにして
釈尊の無私,無心,空の教えが失なわれること無く2500年の永きに亘って受け継がれて来てい
たのか?---実はここに仏教を仏教たらしめる核心があり,そこに表立って書かれる事の無
かった[行]の問題があったのです。
[]
仏教では宗派にかかわらずどこでも信者や修行僧に延々と続く勤行を勤めさせます。
それは延々と題目を唱えたりあるいは太鼓をたたいたり,ぐるぐる歩き続けたり
(比叡山での修行とはひたすらこれである---若い頃禅に傾到したアップルの故スティーブ.
ジョブスが延々と歩かされて頭に来たと言うのは有名な話,
中には水を満した丼を持ってぐるぐる歩くなどという[行]をさせる寺が中国に在る。
あるいは座禅とともに特別な呼吸法を習得させたりもします。
しかし何故このような[行]をさせるのか?---実はこうした[行]自体に特別な意味が有るわけ
では無く,それをすることで条件付けされる脳の側に要点が有ったのです。
[]
人の脳は受覚した情報を処理する時,全ての情報を等しく扱う訳ではありません。
間断なく,五感から入力される情報に加え体の内部情報や運動器官からのフィードバックetcと,
処理せねばならぬ情報は将に膨大でそれの処理をいかに合理化,効率化するかは生体維持の
生理作用同様に極めて重要な問題なのです。(入力される毎秒1100万ビットに対し脳が取
込める情報はせいぜい毎秒16〜50ビットが限界と言われる)
完璧な健康を維持できていても敵の発見が一瞬遅かっただけで全てが無駄になってしまう。
可能な限り自動化,自律化し処理量を減らす事が生存のキーなのです。 従って脳に達する情報
は,その刺激の強度に拘わりなくその重要度(価値観,損得好嫌,危険性など)に応じて処理され
る訳で重要度ナシと分類されたものは完璧に無視される。
あるいは同ーの刺激が繰返される場合,それを評価する閾値 (threshold) が高くなりそれに達し
ない強度の情報を無視するという対応も取られます。
(臭いや騒音に慣れたり,毎日見ている物が注意を引かなくなるetc)
[]
脳の情報処理で重要な事は,この情報の評価分類は生理作用のコントロールにも関与する
大脳古皮質の情動域で行なわれているという事です。
感情が大脳新皮質での価値評価の思考と決定的に異なる点はそれが『己れ』の利益(損得,
安全,生存)に直結した直観的判断に立つという事と,同時にホルモンの分泌をともなっている事で
す。危険の徴候を目撃し“ヤバイ”と感じた瞬間にアドレナリンが分泌され脈拍,血圧が急上昇,防
御や逃走に即応する。しかし危険性も無くあまり損得に関係の無い,延々と繰返される勤行となる
とその同一パターンの情報は感情的には全く無価値,無害のものとして無視され,情動域を素通り
して処理されるようになります。 一方,体の所作は脳の運動領域にパターンとして刷り込まれ
体は自動的に動くようになる。
[]
=つまり延々と続く勤行は『己れ』という利害意識に関わる事なく,自動的に処理されるようになる訳で,
実にこれが仏教における勤行の機能だったのです。つまりこれが
釈尊の教えの核であった無私,無心の現象に外ならず長年この勤行を(無条件に受け容れ)
続けるうちに物事を感情抜きに淡々と処理する心理,脳の対応が身に付いていく。
我執,我欲の源である情動域を素通りしてしまうので我にからんだ妄念に捕われる事も無く,
そもそも執着が無い。 これは元々誰もが脳の中に持って生れている情報処理簡略化のメカニズム
で,何ら特別の現象でも,まして神秘的なものでもありません。 これが,無私が全ての人に普遍で
ある事,かつダルマ(法)が万人に内包されていると言われる根拠に他ならないのです。
この[行]の伝統が保たれていたからこそ,仏教の真髄は今日まで綿々と保たれて来ていた。
つまりその[行]からもたらされる無我無心が実に仏敎の真髄=空無に外なりません。[行]を経て何か気の利いた観念や思想に到達するのではなく、そうした観念や思想のかけらすらも無い空っぽに至る。これが悟りといふものです。
空無であり、何も存在していないのだからそれを形容描写する事もできない。しかしそれの解っていない坊主が無理をして話を作ったものだから後世の仏教は怪し気なオトギ咄で溢れた。そもそも合理主義者の
釈尊が輪廻転生は元より三千世界などを夢想していた筈が無い。=だからこそアーガマ経の中には夢想も空想的奇跡も登場して来ないのです。(前世が無いから生来のカ一ストも無く、当然、サンガにカーストの区別は無かった。)
-----
(それでは,同様に万人に共通な感情,情動はどうなのかと言う疑問が出て来ますが,)
単純な因果関係を見ただけで情動域での判断傾向,欲やエゴ,愛憎執着がトラブルの種になる
事は有っても悟りを開き静寂な生を得るには何の足しにもならないと見たのが
釈尊であったのです。(だからこそ情動域の関与抜き、無心に作業する事が教えられた=キサーゴータミに教えられたのは何の観念でもなく、只走り回る事であった)
(ーーーで,すったもんだの騒々しい人生を送って来た僕個人としては,
騒さいへビーメタルロックも悪くないとは思うのですが) (笑)
___/\___
(必読=修行での矛盾)
[]
Genuine ? — or tampered Scripture
On the end of previous post, I rather casually wrote
“Now look around and check so-called books about the Buddhism.
How many this kind of absurdities you can find ?” —– though,
I realized that it was not so easy job for the most of Buddhists in
the town. Often, they were given only few booklet to read by the leader
or the instructing monk and not used to look for any other scripture.
For the monks, the followers are the cash-cow, of course, they don’t
want the followers to know anything other than “What he is teaching”.
[]
In the net, there are enormous number of the Scriptures available (in different translation).
Here is a sample of website, kindly providing comprehensive collection of the scriptures.
On their list, by scrolling down, soon after the Agama series, you may find a sutra called
[ Compassionate Lotus Sutra ] , click an English version and — you may start reading. —–
though, if you like a shortcut, go to V-6 (0157 / 0158) and scrolling down to somewhere
paragraph 13 =
“‘For the 1004 persons including Fire-Wreath Manavaka, who reads and recites Veda — the
Exterior-Path scriptures, the Tathagata has already awarded them the distinctive marks
of future Buddhahood, which predicts that they will become Buddhas in the Good-kalpa
(Bhadra-kalpa: the present kalpa), and will, by using the three vehicles (yana), enlighten
all the living beings who often commit greed, lechery, anger, ignorance, and arrogance.”
[]
A kind of Buddhists, more often called New-age group of the people, who is believing such
as a mythical power of crystal etc too, also speaking the buzz-words, Veda, Upanishads etc
may not necessarily know the significance of the word Veda —– and this is the most
Un-Buddhists like word.
Veda is the scriptures of Brahmanism, Hinduism but never with the Buddhism as
Lord Buddha took a stance against the existence of perpetual soul (Self = Atoman),
hence against the idea of reincarnation. (When the Self isn’t existing, who reincarnate ?)
[]
As the [Compassionate Lotus Sutra] referred to Veda, obviously this wasn’t a genuine
Buddhist scripture. Likewise, neither the scripture which got many names of Vedic,
Hindu Deities such as Brahma God was not.
As a matter of fact, all the Mahayana scriptures are quite remote from the original
Lord Buddha’s teachings. —– other than some resemblance in the idea of Void.
Mahayana Buddhism might be better understood as a carnival party staff with a lots of
costumed Hindu dancers. It was a party entertainment, choreographed by Nagarujuna.
And in fact, it was an extravaganza of sales ploy! Nagarjuna was quite talented in this
kind as he used to be a performing magician.
[]
Still, the most important core of the Buddhist teachings were kept, not in the scriptures
but in their practice. (Of course, who believe a magical figure from another universe kind,
but through the practice the psychological, physiological change actually occur and it was
noticed by the followers.) This was the reason why Zen teachings says 不立文字 (Never
rely on the lexical teachings) 以心伝心 (Heart to heart transmission).
And why all the Buddhist’s teachings consists endless repeated act as their practice.
(Chanting the name thousands of times, banging the drum, walking round and round so on
—– counting the breath or special way of breathing is literally endless practice.)
—– I’ll talk about this in the coming post.
___/\___
[]
Pear Skin
In this post, I’m talking about completely different several topics.
To start, all of those are the photos of peeled skin of a pear.
— peeled and dried skin. The photo, top photo was taken by
the 4th version of Double-Density Pinhole. (Shutter speed was 1/30th)
And this photo was taken by the Two Elements Homemade Lens.
(Equivalent of F4.5 and 1/250th)
Then this is the normal kind of photo taken by the Canon EF 40 mm F2.8.
(at F11 and 1/100th) Something special was that all those three photos
were taken on the ISO 25,600 setting ! —– Even with such high ISO setting,
the color and the smooth tonal character wasn’t too bad though, very peculiar
point was that the rough grain appeared only on the top (pinhole) photo.
= a sort of common knowledge, the rough grain appears on high ISO setting
= if that was the case, why other two photos doesn’t show the grain at all ? ? ?
The another matter here was,
why drying the fruits peel ?
Well, in order to prevent the fruits Fly
appear, I decided not to make a wet
garbage in a bin, but first dry them
spread next to the window.
(Fly doesn’t come to the exposed, half dry skin)
Once, fruits skin, orange peel etc were dried, they never attract fly = it’s mean
there wouldn’t be any conflict. (may looks a bit messy though, nobody sees it.)
I think this is the Buddhist like solution — remove the cause, resulting no conflict,
fight or killing = What a peaceful solution. Don’t you agree ? 🙂
[]
Quest for Fuzziness
Well, a word Quest might be an over statement and others may say,
it is more like my obsession. 😀
“Concentric double Density Pinhole”
which I invented, is using metallic film
for larger Pinhole though, it has a
dreadful character to create a funny
spark like halo around a bright spot,
as you can see in the
Photo here.
—– Metallic Film was used as a substitute for a Neutral Density Filter though,
the metal coating is far from even and showing lots of hole like pattern and it may
causing that spark like halo. —– I’ve tested with a ND Filter like plastic film, but
it didn’t make a good halo. So, while testing with numerous different materials,
I found a thin plastic film with uneven surface can make a good halo, and
I smeared it with a black soft pen to reduce the light ( = ND Filter effect )
then, made a pinhole on its center. (hence Double Density Pinhole)
The result was —– a soft imaging pinhole which can produce the
almost unusable image. 😀
Still, they ARE a kind of image.
In some taste, it might not too bad. (I would say.) 🙂
Image like this, is like a painting —– and I like it.
(The photo right was illuminated by a LED lamp =
there could be lots more interesting field of possibilities.)
[]
Wash Grapes
Grape is one of the most ancient fruits recorded in the human history
though, as it is the cousin of Ivy, I guess, in the ancient time its
fruits must be as small as Ivy’s berry. (about 1/4″ — 6 mm big ?)
Any how, the matter here is not a big (or small) issue at all = the way to serve.
—– In my bad boy’s habit, there is nothing but a pleasure to steal a fruits.
(Fortunately or unfortunately I didn’t grown up to acquire the pleasure to
steal a woman. 😀 —– before read such menu available
I’ve become a monk (?) —– how shame, what a boring life isn’t it ! )
[]
To pick and eat a fruit in the (Somebody else’s) garden, I wouldn’t be bothered
to wash it while presuming that the dirt has been washed away by the rain, and
no human hand ever touched it anyway.
Though, when I bought it from a shop, I suspect it has been handled rather
dusty condition hence they are not clean. —– So, how to wash it ?
Long before, I was washing the bunch of grapes under a jet of water then later
changed to wash each individual fruits —– I mean one by one, since when
I noticed some time, some of them were covered with quite stubborn film of dirt.
( Remember, we eat grapes with its skin ! —– Japanese grapes can be skinned ! )
And these days, I separate each fruit from a bunch and wash them in a plastic
bawl under the running water while make them well rubbing each other.
[]
Considering the amount of dust we are inhaling and eating, which may consists
sand or dried soil, even dried dog shit etc etc, without knowing, some dirt on
the occasional grapes wouldn’t make any concern. —– So, is this a matter of
principal or most likely the personality ? —– A kind of contemplation such as
“Resisting the dirt would be useless” may have an effect still, the sense of
cleanliness came from one’s up-bringing, and IS the one’s second nature.
[]
So, as a practice, how about the point of so-called “Mindfulness” or “Middle way”
= how can we be “single-minded” and in the same time “be tolerant”.
(Is it a funny question ? )
If you think this is a funny question, your understanding of Buddhism was wrong.
Wrong in the “Thinking” of both “Mindfulness” and the ” Middle way”.
[]
We don’t need to think about how to wash or how to eat grapes. We should just Do.
= Wash or not wash what so ever you Do, IS a reflection of WHO YOU ARE. As you
are born to be under the own Karma, to follow it, is the most natural way to live.
And to be natural, need no thinking = just to be the own.
No thinking or no conscious mean no Self is there. And no Self, no conscious mean
no intentional thinking NOR being not natural, hence no over doing = Middle way.
Without the Self, still able to do what necessary to Do, IS the Mindful way.
In fact, all the teachings of Buddhism are [ To be done without conscious ].
= Live without a conscious of Self IS Selfless. Do without thinking IS Mushin.
When you Do the thing, there are no other things in the mind IS Mindfulness.
And when you Do, no intentional thinking is there, therefore
Do only naturally you need to Do, IS Middle way.
If you are Doing something special to be a Buddhist, IS not Buddhism.
[ Buddhism is Do nothing special, Think nothing as Thinking.
This IS why, Buddhism mean the VOID. —– And this was what
Lord Buddha taught though, it was not fully understood by even
the author of scripture. ]
___/\___
[]
Leiz 35mm Lens — filter size
A camera shop who noticed me got
a soft spot in the particular number,
sold me a lens, Leiz Elmarit-R 35mm
F2.8 which has been converted to
the Nikon mount. By doing so, the
lens lost all the communications to
the camera body = it became totally
manual, hence very difficult to sell.
So, the boss resorted with a pretext as the
lens got the particular number, I ought to buy. 😀
I don’t mind to have a Leiz lens, anyway in a collection, I have Leica R and Leica C,
and to have one more lens wouldn’t create any trouble. And my Canon 5D is an
extremely capable camera which can be used with any lens. THOUGH, Leica is a
notoriously awkward camera company. = All the system was designed to be unique,
therefore the everything has to be genuine Leica made. So, even just like a filter = this
lens got a screw size in odd 48mm. ( Standard filter size is 46mm, 49mm, 52mm, etc.)
In order to use a filter on this lens, a user has to buy a lens-hood which can hold a filter,
and only special series filter can go into its gap. —– you might have guessed,
they comes with an extortionately high price !
A poor man like me can not afford to buy. So, the solution is ……… if no matching
filter is in the market, why not to make one myself.
Outer diameter of the lens top is the same as 49mm filter though the internal
screw is for 48mm —– So, I scraped-off the male screw of 49mm filter, down
to 47mm. Then this filter ring was glued onto the lens top.
So that, the filter size of this lens was converted to the universal 49mm.
(which even allow the use of humble Tamron lens cap. 🙂 )
(Further screw-on another filter doesn’t cause a corner cut-off. )
[]
F-Aperture / Iris Control (2)
This is the up-date of the post with the same title before.
The temporally test circuit of the Iris control then has been made to
a proper board. Still, where to put the battery hasn’t yet fixed.
(At moment the power was connected through the cables.)
To make the drive circuit of Iris control was rather simple (= Just put the
necessary components on a piece of strip board.) though, where to put the
Open-Close Switches gave me a headache. —– Ideally, it should be inside of the
Camera or make the Camera’s shutter button function for the trigger of this Iris
control too. (Asking too much !) Or, alternatively, put the Iris Close Button
right next of the shutter button and press both of them in the same time.
—– On the end, I decided to use the Camera’s remote trigger switch.
Remote trigger switch is double switch. First half press activates the
auto-focus then deeper press trigger the shutter. Though, to the hand made
macro lens, auto-focus switch is no use. I decided to use this switch to close
the Iris, and put a change-over switch to select either Focus or Iris close.
(The button to Open the Iris was put the back of Remote trigger.)
In this setting, Focus and Framing can be done while Iris was fully open,
then the press of button, first close the Iris then expose the picture.
With a use of TTL Flash-light, almost automatically a photo was made !
—– a short coming was, as the trigger was made by Remote Switch in the
left hand, camera was held almost right hand only. = a bit heavy. 😦
Still, the Camera in the free-hand, then just click the shutter and enable
to take picture is a great convenience. 🙂 🙂
[]


















































leave a comment