Unanswered Questions 無記
Without doubt, the biggest problem in Buddhism is that against some questions why
Lord Buddha didn’t give an answer.
This is an issue known as “10 (or 14) Unanswered questions” which was known in Japan and China [無記] = Muki or Wu-ji. —– With seeing all those questions, it is obvious, no answer was given to the matter of [Infinite] [Eternal] kind, the time and the space of the Universe, and the matter related to [I] or [Self].
—- obviously, like us, a small mortals fussing about the infinite eternal Universe kind of imaginary matter IS utterly waste of the time. (Especially when Einstein was not born yet. 😀 )
And the matter of I or Self is not existing = Who can give an answer for “Non-existent phantom” = this was the very fundamental stance of what
Lord Buddha taught, strangely you may think, it was not elucidated in the scripture. —– Why ? Because, such matter was not existing = how to elucidate the Self which is not exists. —– After all, there was no teachings of abstract nor imaginary idea = its mean there was no “Spiritual kind of concept” in the Buddhism.
[]In fact, this is the question even bigger than the “Unanswered Question”.
Lord Buddha denying the existence of the Self / Atman was his fundamental stance therefore, the “matter of the existence of the Self” itself was not existed = because,his own Self was not there. = When he couldn’t see his own Self, in his own mind, how he could guess other’s mind and analyze “so-called Self”.
(It may sound complicated though, IT’S simple — for instance, you may suffer from Alien fever symptom from the space though, actually no such illness ever existed = it was your imagination. In such situation, what is the point to discuss the matter — only the remedy is you to open the eyes and become aware that no such fever exist and symptom was own delusion !)
Lord Buddha’s teaching of No-Self couldn’t have even an explanation because the word to deny the Self is, “in effect” recognize the existence of the Self. It sound strange though, this teachings of Selflessness was not necessary understood even by his closest attendance, Ananda (he was a cousin of Lord Buddha) as he kept asking why not answer.)
When ever a kind of explanation of No-Self appeared in the scripture, it was a kind of metaphor, such as to explain what is Real Giving = “Giving without having a conscious of “I’m giving” is the Real Giving”. Or even worse, “Giving as not Giving” — You can not understand this by reading or by thinking —- but only by DOING.
(I’m sure, if you DO the giving million times, you will become an expert of giving to hand-out the money to a needy, food for a hungry, a rope for a man to hung without need to think ! ) Like the teachings through Tea-making — after 10, 20 years of practice, when the person fully mastered and able to make a perfect Tea, even with the eyes closed, it’s mean all the procedure has been completely programmed into own subconscious and the motor-region of the brain, therefore all the process of Tea-making could be done without the Self or any thinking (= it has all been done in Mushin) — still, it doesn’t necessary the person did (intellectually) understood the Selflessness. ( —– Ideally, the person can make a Tea without having any notion of Zen or Buddhism even Tea-making is the best, and it IS closest to be an Ichijo.)
It would be much clearer to see it in the case how to ride a Bicycle = there is no theory or explanation or understanding is necessary, but by actually master it by the body you can ride it. —– Then, when you ride it, you can do it without a conscious of that you ARE riding the bicycle = “You ARE riding it without your SELF” and more importantly, this selfless condition / situation IS NOT an imaginary / spiritual matter. = IT IS A HARD EXISTENCE. = And to become aware or grasp this condition as it IS (without the literal interpretation = without thinking) IS what all about the the teachings of Lord Buddha. = Just to be riding, as to be Ichijo in riding, even without having the awareness of riding, of course, without the conscious of “Me riding this” = IS the situation becoming a part of the Dharma, or the Dharma itself. (= when you became able to glasp this Dharma, it is your Clear Eyes = So as the Dharma IS not an abstract idea neither imaginary existence = this HARD FACT is the Enlightenment though, in reality, what you ARE seeing IS the same existence and the same fact = this world (nothing new neither special) = hence, it’s a Dog Shit.
And this tradition = learn from the practice, only kept Zen Buddhism as Buddhism of No-Self —– not by the scripture which doesn’t contain the explanation of [Selflessness] anyway. —– Think, Selflessness IS NOT a spiritual matter at all. It IS a fact “you can do it without your own conscious” and its physical, neuro-phisiological mechanism IS the Selflessness.
___/\___
[]
Ghost — Buddha’s Psychological Profile
Can you describe the details of a Ghost ? — how it looks etc, etc. — CAN YOU ?
Imagine, it was a kind of public gathering and somebody started to talk about seeing
a ghost and some others responded and told their own experience or hear-say but
most of the others didn’t say anything, other than murmuring their doubt.
—– I think this is the general situation and it wasn’t so different in 2,500 years ago
in India, even if more superstitious people was there, still, only very few could say
actually seen it.
[]
Lord Buddha’s time, when out of Sanskrit / Vedic belief, a new religion, later known
to be the Hinduism was emerging. Over the Sanskrit belief of perpetually remaining
soul, Hinduism put an emphasis on the reincarnation of each soul which reflect the
previous life = hence, the life in this world is the result of previous life, in other words,
every life was fixed which makes a person’s Cast.
—– This idea horrified the people then = the endless cycle of reincarnation traps the
person, if not make the worst to reborn to be a beast.
To against this idea of endless suffering of reincarnation, (called Samsara)
Lord Buddha was the one offering the rescue, saying “Don’t worry, no such things
like endless reincarnation, because the one supposed to be reincarnated = the Self or
so-called Atman is not existing, therefore when your body dies, it is the total end =
Nirvana” and offering the refuge where there is no notion of Cast or previous life.
[]
Lord Buddha’s this understanding came from the observation of the Karma and
the Dharma. Everything depend and rely on others in every moment.
Without this inter-dependency, nothing could exists, so as our body and the mind.
It’s mean, when the body goes, the mind which has been imagining the self, also goes.
The self is mere illusion and the cause of all the troubles. As it was clearly stated
in the Four Noble Truth, the Life IS nothing but the suffering. —– In this respect,
Lord Buddha gave no illusion. Very realistic and blunt. To observe and give an
insight to the relation between the phenomena of the Karma, eyes and the brain has
to be as clear as a crystal or like a critical scientist.
No illusion, not mention a delusion was in the mind of
Lord Buddha, it’s mean, there was no notion of Ghost existed. = As such notion
was not exists in the first place, no such image, let alone the word exist there.
No ghost exist, and its source, the Self itself neither exist. Therefore, not only the notion
of Self, but the attitude to recognize or mind it shouldn’t be there. Hence, in this respect,
Lord Buddha was very strict, even harsh. When somebody who couldn’t understand
the imprecation of No Self, made a question “What happens after the person’s death ?”
its question was completely ignored. —– (There was a description in the Agama Sutra
“Completely stop speaking is same as to kill the person” )
[]
To understand this post, please read “Test of Selflessness” as well.
___/\___
[]
Wash Grapes
Grape is one of the most ancient fruits recorded in the human history
though, as it is the cousin of Ivy, I guess, in the ancient time its
fruits must be as small as Ivy’s berry. (about 1/4″ — 6 mm big ?)
Any how, the matter here is not a big (or small) issue at all = the way to serve.
—– In my bad boy’s habit, there is nothing but a pleasure to steal a fruits.
(Fortunately or unfortunately I didn’t grown up to acquire the pleasure to
steal a woman. 😀 —– before read such menu available
I’ve become a monk (?) —– how shame, what a boring life isn’t it ! )
[]
To pick and eat a fruit in the (Somebody else’s) garden, I wouldn’t be bothered
to wash it while presuming that the dirt has been washed away by the rain, and
no human hand ever touched it anyway.
Though, when I bought it from a shop, I suspect it has been handled rather
dusty condition hence they are not clean. —– So, how to wash it ?
Long before, I was washing the bunch of grapes under a jet of water then later
changed to wash each individual fruits —– I mean one by one, since when
I noticed some time, some of them were covered with quite stubborn film of dirt.
( Remember, we eat grapes with its skin ! —– Japanese grapes can be skinned ! )
And these days, I separate each fruit from a bunch and wash them in a plastic
bawl under the running water while make them well rubbing each other.
[]
Considering the amount of dust we are inhaling and eating, which may consists
sand or dried soil, even dried dog shit etc etc, without knowing, some dirt on
the occasional grapes wouldn’t make any concern. —– So, is this a matter of
principal or most likely the personality ? —– A kind of contemplation such as
“Resisting the dirt would be useless” may have an effect still, the sense of
cleanliness came from one’s up-bringing, and IS the one’s second nature.
[]
So, as a practice, how about the point of so-called “Mindfulness” or “Middle way”
= how can we be “single-minded” and in the same time “be tolerant”.
(Is it a funny question ? )
If you think this is a funny question, your understanding of Buddhism was wrong.
Wrong in the “Thinking” of both “Mindfulness” and the ” Middle way”.
[]
We don’t need to think about how to wash or how to eat grapes. We should just Do.
= Wash or not wash what so ever you Do, IS a reflection of WHO YOU ARE. As you
are born to be under the own Karma, to follow it, is the most natural way to live.
And to be natural, need no thinking = just to be the own.
No thinking or no conscious mean no Self is there. And no Self, no conscious mean
no intentional thinking NOR being not natural, hence no over doing = Middle way.
Without the Self, still able to do what necessary to Do, IS the Mindful way.
In fact, all the teachings of Buddhism are [ To be done without conscious ].
= Live without a conscious of Self IS Selfless. Do without thinking IS Mushin.
When you Do the thing, there are no other things in the mind IS Mindfulness.
And when you Do, no intentional thinking is there, therefore
Do only naturally you need to Do, IS Middle way.
If you are Doing something special to be a Buddhist, IS not Buddhism.
[ Buddhism is Do nothing special, Think nothing as Thinking.
This IS why, Buddhism mean the VOID. —– And this was what
Lord Buddha taught though, it was not fully understood by even
the author of scripture. ]
___/\___
[]
Why “Don’t Think” ? ? ?
When you are walking, you never thought about how to move your foot.
Same as to read this blog. You are using your brain and thinking “What a hell
this guy is talking about” still, it is about the meaning of “What was written”
but not about the action, [Reading] itself. = Your eyes automatically scan the
line and pick the pattern of Alphabet —– and in most of the case, you don’t need
to even think what I wrote here = as no sophisticated literacy or academic
knowledges were needed to read this.
So that, to read this, you don’t need to “Consciously” think anything.
Almost automatically your eyes gliding over the line. (While unconsciously
feeling “nothing special = ignore this” 🙂 )
[]
Yet still, when the matter came to the famous theory of [Nut Macadam]
suddenly your brain awake and try to sort out “What this Nut Macadam is”
because you don’t know what this is, and you don’t want branded to be an
Ignorant = since this could be important and missing this might be
disadvantageous. = (Your Greed and Ego was alerted !)
So that, suddenly your thinking started to be in full swing. (Though,
no such Nut Macadam has a value more than a Peanut, this
thinking process would find nothing.)
[]
Like this experiment, you may become aware a fact that the thinking is
associated with the own ego and greed. In other words, your own “Self”.
“The Self” is so eager to defend the own interest and try to gain something
though, see the situation. On the end what you gain ? = And in any way
you will loose all you have gained and die soon or later.
(So, Don’t think is in fact same as “To be Selfless”)
Or is it a game to make a life more fun ?
(Make a life more fun = this is in fact the way of the Mahayana, instead to
live sombre life with so-called “Contemplation”. 🙂 )
___/\___
[]
Self-sacrifice — is it same to Selfless ? ? ?
Time to time, a search-term “Self-sacrifice” came to here. = It seems, the Self
is the main issue of Buddhism, Self-sacrifice and Self-denial is always taking
quite an attention. And in deed I myself talked about this in the past.
= I wrote that to reach Zen or Buddhism understanding, it is necessary to
have a self-denial or a self-sacrifice in a certain stage of
the pathway to see who the own Self is.
Though, the Aim of Buddhism is not “Wrestling with the SELF”= try to
eliminate and struggle. But Being Buddhist is simply being selfless,
since the Self is not exists in the first place.
[]
—– You might be confused. This is the same situation like a “Disease”
= say XYZ syndrome. People may talk about what that syndrome is,
how to treat or eradicate it. Though the teaching of
Lord Buddha didn’t mention the existence of such disease. Such disease exists
only in one’s mind = NOT exist mean no point to know about alleged symptom,
let alone how to deny or eradicate it. = In other words, to think Self-denial or
Self-sacrifice as if it was the essence of Buddhism is, utterly a misunderstanding
= Here is a man trying to find and use a fire-extinguisher —– shame, there
wasn’t a fire, he only thought it was.
Don’t mix-up “to know, Fire is not exists” with extinguish a Fire.
Deny the Self is not close or same to the Selfless. Deny mean, the Self has been
defined and confirmed of its existence ! = Wrong direction to start.
[]
In our daily life, fundamentally there isn’t a conscious of Self,
hence things were done Selflessly.
So that, while reading this blog, have you been aware that your eyes are tracing
the line, not mention that YOU ARE reading this. YOU are in deed, doing all those
unconsciously. = Since you were alerted, now you became conscious of YOU.
Otherwise you didn’t need to become conscious of yourself to read this — in fact to
do anything or to live. Ironically, human got over-sized brain and so-called Mind,
even worse got Selfish Ego and Greed kind. When ever you were alerted and
became conscious about your “right” or “gain or loss” this kind of “Mind” often gave
us the interruption — “Hey, it’s a chance” or “Don’t loose” kind. 🙂
Lord Buddha found that this “Imaginary products” is the cause of all the troubles
even though, we can have a life without it. And found that the idea of SELF, the
generator of all those Mind is the root cause, despite it is nothing but an illusion.
So, he taught to have “Clear eyes and the Mind” to distinguish the illusion or delusion
and the Truth. —– Yet still, we poor human tend to cling own Self and accompanying
sense of Self-loving Emotion, so that, when we do something for ourselves, we can not
handle it in the detached clear eyes and the mind. The emotion which bound
the integration of Self is always there.
[]
In contrast, when we needed to do something for somebody else, not all of us are
very keen = We just do it as an extra task = often with quite detached mind, no
pleasure, even no Self conviction there.
(Let the hands do the work. The mind is somewhere else. 🙂 )
You can see that to do something for others, we do it detached, Selfless manner.
When you do, you do it dispassionate as it was seen objectively in quite rational
manner. = Because, it belong to the others, there is no attachment, still has to do
the job, job would be handled dispassionately as a given task. —– this situation
can be seen as the Self-sacrifice. And the dispassionate detached mind was
mixed-up with the selflessness.
= This was how and why the misinterpretation has occurred.
—– Self-denial or Self-sacrifice is not an idea of Buddhism. Still, if there was a
situation to DO, real Buddhist would just DO without any question, since
there was no Self, therefore no wrangling Mind but the Karma put him to DO.
Though, by the eyes of others, it could be seen as if it was a self-sacrifice because
of it was not his own needs, and it was interpreted that he was forced to obey the
situation while denying his own will, himself.
[]
But, to see “Do something to others” only in the view of Self-denial or Self-sacrifice
is in deed the most Un-Buddhist like view.
It is nothing but an Egotistic, stingy, small “mind”. —– Do something could be
a good exercise, do somebody’s work could be new experience — etc etc.
Don’t waste the time clinging with useless mind. Just DO.
___/\___
[]
Walk on Greenwich (2)
Those photos were taken same time as the previous post,
and this is the group of flower images. Yes, it’s the spring.
And yet more Magnolia.
This is a Rhododendron ! —– It’s crazy. Rhododendron in March ? ? ?
And this is a Catkin though, I don’t know the Catkin of which tree. 🙂
——————————————–
Those photos were the odd addition. —— round the corner of the town.
Time to time I see Olive tree, still to see it fruiting was very rare.
By the way, this is my 600th post still, nothing special
= life just goes on as Zen.
___/\___
[]
Mind-set of the Medallist
Now the news from Sochi Winter Olympic is the regular feature in the media.
So, naturally I read quite number of the words from the Medallists “How he
(or she) came to this point”. Such as the one from the first Gold Medallist
of Japan, Yuzuru Hanyu (羽生結弦) the Figure Skater.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SoqHZH6KE1c
—– (Unfortunately I couldn’t find a proper video from Sochi in Youtube =
most of them are either old clips or the clip only using his name with
crap contents. = this one from last year’s competition.)
Yuzuru grown up in Sendai, Japan the place received that earthquake and
tsunami few years ago. So, even he had a part of the same fate, couldn’t
practice for 6 months, as a local ice-rink was destroyed, on top of all sorts
of life’s ups and downs. —– still, in his word on an interview, he said
“On the end I came to the point to realize that I couldn’t be anybody
more than myself or anybody less than myself, and understood, there
couldn’t be anything else but to go the life to be a skater.”
= No pretence of special pride carrying the top name or the feeling carrying
the duty to the country. (Yet still, when he won, he carried Japanese Flag
on his shoulder. = He was thank-full to the people who supported him
back in Japan. —– He was a nice 19 years old boy !)
[]
This is in fact quite common feeling among the athletes who became
top medallist. = Non boasted the words like “I came to the Olympic to win
for my country”—– but “Just did my best and it happened to be an Olympic”.
[]
It is a common misconception = “To achieve such highest goal, it must need
to have highest concentration of the Will and the strong Mindset”.
—– strangely you might think, the stronger the will or higher the aim or
desire kind, it fails to achieve the goal. —– We human was not designed to
withstand to maintain such hard will, and our fate is not providing plain
sailing. = The higher the aim, the stronger the disappointment when the ship
hit an obstacle, then the person brake down.
[]
Athletes compete physical game though, it is in fact a very heavy mental game.
Minute fear or negative doubt would hinder the moment of judgement.
After thousands, tens of thousands of practices, the body got accustomed to
perform routine = let the body to perform. = No “Will, Aim, Pride, Pretence,
Desire, Show-off, Sense of Obligation, Duty, Fear, Doubt, Arrogance or Shame”
= in other words ANY MIND was not required here. = Just Do it.
Any how, in the moment when the athlete is competing, there couldn’t be
a margin to haggle any thought.
—– ? ? ? —– Don’t you think it’s sound familiar ?
Yes. This is exactly the same mental state to Mushin and Ichijo of the Zen.
Or, the Selflessness of the Buddhism. —– are they Buddhist ? Not necessary.
[]
Lord Buddha’s teachings = Buddhism, was the wisdom learned from the
human nature, and been applied to the general aspects of the life.
Wisdom in the human nature which was prevailed in the process of extreme
practice was in fact the wisdom held by the universe = Rules of the Universe,
which is in the Buddhist’s term Dharma.
[]
And the contemplation those athletes has gained, is nothing but
their Enlightenment = Being nobody else of the Self, who is in fact Selfless.
= This selflessness is in deed, the Dharma.
___/\___
[]
Mistranslation of “MINDFULNESS”
When a person is walking —– in most of the case, the person is
not aware that HE (SHE) has been walking.
—– it is the same situation as you didn’t aware that your eyes has
been busy reading this blog on this very moment.
So, it is crystal clear, unless you become aware and intentionally think
that you are reading this, your brain is just busy processing the meaning
what was written, but paying little attention to the fact that who the
person reading this. = It’s mean, the awareness of you, yourself and what
and how you are existing here, doesn’t exists unless you are intentionally
think about it = because, “The existence of the SELF” is only in our mind
= SELF is a product of the one’s thinking. —– Also, it is obvious, once you
started to think about “That I am reading this etc etc” the efficiency of
reading drop drastically. That’s why “This kind of thinking etc etc” were
called “Zatsunen”(雑念) = useless thinking or destruction. 🙂
[]
Lord Buddha thought exactly the same and came to the conclusion, that we
were designed to live without those conscious = useless thinkings and the
imaginary SELF. We can be far better-off living and doing without those
“Zatsunen” because, without the destruction we were naturally controlled
by the Dharma. Live and Do without useless thinking, is Mushin and being
with Dharma is Ichijo. = Then, what is this Dharma here, the Dharma who
controls us. How this Dharma did know that the person IS walking or reading.
And how and what this Dharma remember how to walk or read, not mention
better way of doing them than our conscious controls.
—– (To cut the story short, I give you the answer here = they are the
subconscious control program, programmed and memorized into our brain
—– some has been even genetically programmed !)
—– This Dharma is the very Mindfulness and to let it control our action or
ourselves also called Mindfulness.
(In fact in my view, the choice of this word “Mindfulness” against the
Pali word “Sati” was the mistake
= it should have been “Retained Dharma” or simply just “Truth”.
—– It seems, all the misunderstanding of the Zen in the west has been
caused by this mistranslation ! = as it had given an impression that it was
the matter of the Mind-set —– but the essence is, NOT having it. 🙂 )
[]
—– Now, the reader who experienced so-called Zen training might have
realized a funny things “where on earth so-called “Mindfulness Training”
such as that counting and concentrating to the breath etc etc, came from”.
—– I mean even in the ancient time when Theravada Canon was written.
—– In fact, this was the very very evidence of that the teachings of
Lord Buddha had misinterpreted from the beginning !
The Sati in the Meditation is, to let the Dharma made us sit = completely
abandon our SELF and get Mushin and just sit, is what the state of
Mindfulness on the (sitting) Meditation mean.
—– Who got the idea “To Think the breath and Feel the body etc etc”
= intentionally bring a Zatsunen / Useless thinking into the practice. 😀
(—– That was why the other school or sect has invented and since been
using other practice which couldn’t allow any useless thinking while doing it,
such as Shaolin martial-art or carrying a bowlful of water etc.)
—– Buddhism and the Zen is a strange mysterious teachings = not because
it got mysterious teachings but it got strange out of context mix-up and
wrong interpretations. 😀
The trouble is, still many people believing it, like wearing a
“Fashionable” T-shirts which got exotic Chinese character
printed upside-down. (It is in fact, nothing but, the insult to
Lord Buddha.)
___/\___
[]
釈尊の教え---Buddha’s Original Teachings
Note : This post is parallel with this and this post in English.
釈尊の教えが元々如何なるものであったかを知るには,教えの与えられたその時代,
その時の思考,その瞬間の心理の機微を知る必要があります。
人々の問い掛けに,その瞬間の機知で応えていたとされる
釈尊の教えに抽象的な想念は無く,全ては対話に立った明解な英知であったのです。
人々の問いかけもごく日常的な問題,その世相のトピックスであった訳ですが,
釈尊の時代は将にヒンズー教の勃興期で,当然の事として新しい流行思想が話題の中心に
なっていた訳です。 古典的べーダに根ざした道徳論的,儀式的バラモン教から派生した
ヒンズー教は当時の新興宗敎で「霊魂が生れ代り次の生を規定し,
それがカーストになる」とした画期的な流行理念であったのですが,この流行とそれの
もたらした恐怖は,かつての「天中殺」の流行を想い浮ベるとピンと来るでしょう。
根拠も,何の証拠も無いでっち上げであるにも拘らず,世の人というのは
コロっとだまされパニックに陥る。この「輪廻の輪」という妄念に囚われた人々に
明解な答を与え,無要な心配やカーストのクビキから解放するというのが
釈尊の直面した火急の任務であったのです。 何の根拠も無いそのような妄念に対して
釈尊は極めて論理的,合理的な解答として「心配するには及ばない。万物は(我々も)
因果,縁の上にのみ存在しているのだから,当然の事として肉体が死ねば,
そこに根ざしていた意識も自覚も,苦悩も消滅する。これが涅槃で,それは誰もが
自然に得られるもの。我やカーストなど単に頭で作り出した妄念である」と説かれたのです。
[]
ヒンズー教で言う「無限に続く死と再生の繰返し=苦界/娑婆/サムサラ」に対して,
釈尊は「輪廻,再生すベき「我」などと言うものはそもそも存在しない」と説かれた訳
ですが,存在しない物を説明するというのは至難の業です。(概念,言葉も無い!)
例えば,全てが共有され私有物の無い社会で「盗み」とかその罪について議論する事はできない。
重力の在る地球上でなら「もしこの重力が無かったら--」と考える事ができますが,元々
重力の無い世界に暮していたら,重力とはいったいどんなものなのか想像もできないでしょう。
無私,無我である事はできる(一如として)が,それを客観的に自覚した瞬間に一如は消滅する。
(眼の存在の自覚なしにこれを読んでいても,言われて気がついた途端に一如が崩壊する)。
つまり無私を説明するとは外ならぬ「私,我」の存在の認知になってしまう訳です。当然の事として
釈尊が「我」を話題にする事は無く,「魂は死後どこへ行くのか?」といった質問は存在し得ない
物で,それに対する答が与えられる筈も無かったのです。つまり
釈尊は本人が「無我」に一如であった故に「我」の存在に関しては完璧に「無記」だったのです!
[]
従って,仏教の中で最も重要な無私,無我(アナトマン)の教えは,実は体得する以外にない。
不立文字,教外別伝,以心伝心となる由縁です。(無心に,黙々とやるのみ)
しかし逆に言えば,言葉の上で定義し得ないために,誤解曲解が生じる原因にもなったのです。
---で,この曲解はごく初期のうちに起っていて,輪廻やサムサラを説く仏典は
実はヒンズーやタントラの混交でしかありません。
無私無我を教理の根底に置く時に,いったい何が誰が,死後も留って生れ代るのか?
釈尊がそんな矛盾した馬鹿な事を言うはずが無いでしょう。(笑)
しかしケダモノに生れ代るかも知れないと心配する人々の恐怖感は職業僧の飯のタネ,
彼らが話を書変えてしまったのです。
在りもしないあの世から戻って来て「話が違う」と文句をつける人は絶対居ないのですから
どんなホラを吹いてもバレません! 実に困った“虚偽表示”です。(大笑)
___/\___
—————-
PS: The image on top was created by [Mouhitsu] of Japan-Post.
Though, the work has to be saved and its “png” has to be converted
by this process —– Bring the Downloaded image to desktop. and
Double-click this => “Open with” =>[Paint] —– then click and open
left top icon and go to “Save as”=>”jpeg” (Yes, to asking small window)
—–> The saved image is on the Desktop ! 🙂
-[]






















2 comments