Leiz 35mm Lens — filter size
A camera shop who noticed me got
a soft spot in the particular number,
sold me a lens, Leiz Elmarit-R 35mm
F2.8 which has been converted to
the Nikon mount. By doing so, the
lens lost all the communications to
the camera body = it became totally
manual, hence very difficult to sell.
So, the boss resorted with a pretext as the
lens got the particular number, I ought to buy. 😀
I don’t mind to have a Leiz lens, anyway in a collection, I have Leica R and Leica C,
and to have one more lens wouldn’t create any trouble. And my Canon 5D is an
extremely capable camera which can be used with any lens. THOUGH, Leica is a
notoriously awkward camera company. = All the system was designed to be unique,
therefore the everything has to be genuine Leica made. So, even just like a filter = this
lens got a screw size in odd 48mm. ( Standard filter size is 46mm, 49mm, 52mm, etc.)
In order to use a filter on this lens, a user has to buy a lens-hood which can hold a filter,
and only special series filter can go into its gap. —– you might have guessed,
they comes with an extortionately high price !
A poor man like me can not afford to buy. So, the solution is ……… if no matching
filter is in the market, why not to make one myself.
Outer diameter of the lens top is the same as 49mm filter though the internal
screw is for 48mm —– So, I scraped-off the male screw of 49mm filter, down
to 47mm. Then this filter ring was glued onto the lens top.
So that, the filter size of this lens was converted to the universal 49mm.
(which even allow the use of humble Tamron lens cap. 🙂 )
(Further screw-on another filter doesn’t cause a corner cut-off. )
[]
Quasi-Portrait — another Population
Dummy or Figure what ever called,
they are there —– are they ?
Same as a children’s toy or even a pet animal,
how do you take count or to recognize them ?
Do they exists like a person or are they
just a piece of material ?
As some one suggested, aren’t they active in
the middle of night without us knowing ?
M m m m m ?
Why they are there in that shape ?
Who asked them there or created as they are ?
So, —– are they just a product of our delusion ? —– or even our desire ? ? ?
But are they or aren’t they ?
Or the commercialism expecting them to get our attention ?
Or we are having a delusion over them to act for our desire ?
Or we are having a misunderstanding “Once I had a time with him (or her)” ?
Is that a dream we want ? = a proof of “I was” —– a memory taken to where ?
To the heaven ? —– Do you believe is there such things exists ?
How bizarre isn’t it ! Is this a nature of us, human mind ? ? ?
——-
(Those photos were taken by Leiz Elmarit-R 35mm F2.8 on Canon 5D Mk-III
—– This lens creates phenomenally crisp image ! )
[]
Pink — Impressionist’s Pink !
In early spring when the sun is not strong, the flower has to rely on its
hi-visibility color = yellow to appeal to the insects.
But when the spring deepen with increasing sun light, flowers who got other
tactics such as sweet scent doesn’t need to rely on its visibility, hence free to
pleasure with another color. —– Then the Pink become in fashion. 😀
Though, I’m not knowledgeable enough whether those Pink has any effect to the
human psychology. Why a young lady saw something naughty blushs pink (red ?)
or a glass or two drinks makes the cheek pink ?
My friends has been rather wondering, or even suspicious about my eyes or
mental condition if those fuzzy images were the symptom of poor eyesight or
a kind of drowsiness for some kind of intoxication. 😀
Surely, drunken wouldn’t say “I’m drunk” and I think I can focus if I need.
Those photos above were taken by the lens from Kodak Fun Camera on 5D.
But this photo above were taken by the Wide-angle double-density Pinhole.
And this one is a normal photo as a reference
—– whether you feel boring or sigh of relief (at home). 😀
[]
Self-sacrifice — is it same to Selfless ? ? ?
Time to time, a search-term “Self-sacrifice” came to here. = It seems, the Self
is the main issue of Buddhism, Self-sacrifice and Self-denial is always taking
quite an attention. And in deed I myself talked about this in the past.
= I wrote that to reach Zen or Buddhism understanding, it is necessary to
have a self-denial or a self-sacrifice in a certain stage of
the pathway to see who the own Self is.
Though, the Aim of Buddhism is not “Wrestling with the SELF”= try to
eliminate and struggle. But Being Buddhist is simply being selfless,
since the Self is not exists in the first place.
[]
—– You might be confused. This is the same situation like a “Disease”
= say XYZ syndrome. People may talk about what that syndrome is,
how to treat or eradicate it. Though the teaching of
Lord Buddha didn’t mention the existence of such disease. Such disease exists
only in one’s mind = NOT exist mean no point to know about alleged symptom,
let alone how to deny or eradicate it. = In other words, to think Self-denial or
Self-sacrifice as if it was the essence of Buddhism is, utterly a misunderstanding
= Here is a man trying to find and use a fire-extinguisher —– shame, there
wasn’t a fire, he only thought it was.
Don’t mix-up “to know, Fire is not exists” with extinguish a Fire.
Deny the Self is not close or same to the Selfless. Deny mean, the Self has been
defined and confirmed of its existence ! = Wrong direction to start.
[]
In our daily life, fundamentally there isn’t a conscious of Self,
hence things were done Selflessly.
So that, while reading this blog, have you been aware that your eyes are tracing
the line, not mention that YOU ARE reading this. YOU are in deed, doing all those
unconsciously. = Since you were alerted, now you became conscious of YOU.
Otherwise you didn’t need to become conscious of yourself to read this — in fact to
do anything or to live. Ironically, human got over-sized brain and so-called Mind,
even worse got Selfish Ego and Greed kind. When ever you were alerted and
became conscious about your “right” or “gain or loss” this kind of “Mind” often gave
us the interruption — “Hey, it’s a chance” or “Don’t loose” kind. 🙂
Lord Buddha found that this “Imaginary products” is the cause of all the troubles
even though, we can have a life without it. And found that the idea of SELF, the
generator of all those Mind is the root cause, despite it is nothing but an illusion.
So, he taught to have “Clear eyes and the Mind” to distinguish the illusion or delusion
and the Truth. —– Yet still, we poor human tend to cling own Self and accompanying
sense of Self-loving Emotion, so that, when we do something for ourselves, we can not
handle it in the detached clear eyes and the mind. The emotion which bound
the integration of Self is always there.
[]
In contrast, when we needed to do something for somebody else, not all of us are
very keen = We just do it as an extra task = often with quite detached mind, no
pleasure, even no Self conviction there.
(Let the hands do the work. The mind is somewhere else. 🙂 )
You can see that to do something for others, we do it detached, Selfless manner.
When you do, you do it dispassionate as it was seen objectively in quite rational
manner. = Because, it belong to the others, there is no attachment, still has to do
the job, job would be handled dispassionately as a given task. —– this situation
can be seen as the Self-sacrifice. And the dispassionate detached mind was
mixed-up with the selflessness.
= This was how and why the misinterpretation has occurred.
—– Self-denial or Self-sacrifice is not an idea of Buddhism. Still, if there was a
situation to DO, real Buddhist would just DO without any question, since
there was no Self, therefore no wrangling Mind but the Karma put him to DO.
Though, by the eyes of others, it could be seen as if it was a self-sacrifice because
of it was not his own needs, and it was interpreted that he was forced to obey the
situation while denying his own will, himself.
[]
But, to see “Do something to others” only in the view of Self-denial or Self-sacrifice
is in deed the most Un-Buddhist like view.
It is nothing but an Egotistic, stingy, small “mind”. —– Do something could be
a good exercise, do somebody’s work could be new experience — etc etc.
Don’t waste the time clinging with useless mind. Just DO.
___/\___
[]
Walk on Greenwich
Together with a friend who started photography, walking
the Greenwich became rather regular event.
Anyhow, spring has come and the day was so fine.
And a lots of tourists. (Nothing to do with me though.)
No complaint, or comment. —– why do I need.
(Zeiss 18mm, Tamron SP 500mm on Nikon D810 )
[]
Good Lens or Cheap Lens
Some regular reader may remember, this lens has appeared here before.
But if you look inside, you may noticed that this one doesn’t have shiny
blue beer can. = In deed, the front lens is the same though, the panel, and
the pinhole inside is different. I did swap the panel to single pinhole hence,
it still has semi-fisheye wide angle view but the image doesn’t have a
hallasion created by the Double Density Pinhole.
The front lens came from an ubiquitous cheap Fish-eye Adapter, therefore,
giving fish-eye like distortion and wide-angle view, but being as low cost =
single lens structure showing the Chromatic Aberration. = Part enlarged
bright-spot of Photo above, rainbow effect is quite visible.
Theory was the same = ” Place a strong concave lens before Pinhole would
creates [Wide angle Pinhole Image]” and this one has a concave lens from a
Canon Zoom Lens. = which is in deed the front element of the same lens I’ve
experimented with its rear element in the previous post.
And I put the same Double-Density Pinhole panel behind of this lens.
This Canon’s Zoom was EFS type 18~55 mm hence, it was a kind of
medium wide-angle, so that even a front element concave lens was not too
strong = giving modest wide view. (Though, still having quite a distortion.)
Yet still, the lens carrying the quality of the Canon = this front element
has an Achromatic design = no Chromatic aberration was visible.
So that, thanks to this high quality Diopt-Pinhole Photo System, on a
full-frame 5D Mk-III camera, I can take high-quality Fuzzy image !
(I’m serious, believe me. Ha ha ha 😀 😀 )
———————–
IN ADDITION: This is the front element from a Sigma Zoom Lens.
Lens came from a friend of my friend who gave-up to repair the lens.
(The person managed to disassemble though, couldn’t put it back.)
It seems Sigma was used all sorts of clever tricks to produce the lens
“Reasonable”= not superb, still good enough, light and small, and
most importantly, not expensive for the people of this class.
The front lens seems to be plastic = easy to be scratched (Photo Left)
and the Photo Right shows funny reflection = this is an “Aspherical Lens “.
You may have a fancy illusion toward the Aspherical Lens. = Yes, Aspherical
lens can give superb optical quality though, these days, it was used as a
magic bullet to save a cost ! (Instead to use many heavy and expensive
Grass, just one plastic Aspherical Lens could eliminates the aberration.)
Because, Aspherical lens is no longer difficult to make nor expensive.
= Computer give the design and the laser curving can make a precise
die-cast, then the rest would be just a plastic mass-production work.
As a rather ordinary x3 Zoom, the strength of the front Concave lens is
similar to the Canon’s Zoom shown before. The front element consists
two lenses hence it supposed to be an Achromatic design —– though
photo above shows the Chromatic Aberration. (See the rainbow color.)
(of cause, it might be corrected together with the rear element.)
And I put a single pinhole behind of this lens.
[]
Too Early Spring (2)
This is definitely a Cherry tree though, she already started to bloom.
(on 10th of March !)
And somewhere in the town, I saw two of the Common Magnolia in full bloom.
This is yet another Magnolia tree.
In London, the temperature became as high as 25 degree C yesterday.
May be having a warmer weather seems to be better than frosty one
—– though, I’m not necessary comfortable. It’s something wrong.
PS: ————————–
I just found this cherry tree in full bloom in the Greenwich.
I’ve been here around every Wednesday though, there wasn’t a flower
last week —– and suddenly today ! 🙂 ( Honest, Believe me. 😀 )
[]
Spiritual Deptford
In the east London, whether it is north or south of the Thames, the
churches there is quite big and well built. It is the luminescence of how
the area used to be rich with its industry and the people working there.
Of cause, the east London was the Dockland =
center of the ship building and the sea trade.
But I guess, the Anglican Church, such as in the top photo may not having
so many attendance now, still the “Cathedral” photo above may attracting
a lots of worshippers. (I didn’t ask which sect —– may be Evangelistic.)
So, it seems this town is having a quite fanatic followers of
the Christian persuasion.
M m m m ?
I’m not necessary convinced that the spirit was made buy glittering
plastic though, it is not my business or the matter I should go into.
—– I rather feel, this Deptford Creek must have seen and seeing
the change of the time and carried a scum of human life away,
for hundreds, thousands of the years
—– this is my spiritual response to this town.
___/\___
[]
Mind-set of the Medallist
Now the news from Sochi Winter Olympic is the regular feature in the media.
So, naturally I read quite number of the words from the Medallists “How he
(or she) came to this point”. Such as the one from the first Gold Medallist
of Japan, Yuzuru Hanyu (羽生結弦) the Figure Skater.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SoqHZH6KE1c
—– (Unfortunately I couldn’t find a proper video from Sochi in Youtube =
most of them are either old clips or the clip only using his name with
crap contents. = this one from last year’s competition.)
Yuzuru grown up in Sendai, Japan the place received that earthquake and
tsunami few years ago. So, even he had a part of the same fate, couldn’t
practice for 6 months, as a local ice-rink was destroyed, on top of all sorts
of life’s ups and downs. —– still, in his word on an interview, he said
“On the end I came to the point to realize that I couldn’t be anybody
more than myself or anybody less than myself, and understood, there
couldn’t be anything else but to go the life to be a skater.”
= No pretence of special pride carrying the top name or the feeling carrying
the duty to the country. (Yet still, when he won, he carried Japanese Flag
on his shoulder. = He was thank-full to the people who supported him
back in Japan. —– He was a nice 19 years old boy !)
[]
This is in fact quite common feeling among the athletes who became
top medallist. = Non boasted the words like “I came to the Olympic to win
for my country”—– but “Just did my best and it happened to be an Olympic”.
[]
It is a common misconception = “To achieve such highest goal, it must need
to have highest concentration of the Will and the strong Mindset”.
—– strangely you might think, the stronger the will or higher the aim or
desire kind, it fails to achieve the goal. —– We human was not designed to
withstand to maintain such hard will, and our fate is not providing plain
sailing. = The higher the aim, the stronger the disappointment when the ship
hit an obstacle, then the person brake down.
[]
Athletes compete physical game though, it is in fact a very heavy mental game.
Minute fear or negative doubt would hinder the moment of judgement.
After thousands, tens of thousands of practices, the body got accustomed to
perform routine = let the body to perform. = No “Will, Aim, Pride, Pretence,
Desire, Show-off, Sense of Obligation, Duty, Fear, Doubt, Arrogance or Shame”
= in other words ANY MIND was not required here. = Just Do it.
Any how, in the moment when the athlete is competing, there couldn’t be
a margin to haggle any thought.
—– ? ? ? —– Don’t you think it’s sound familiar ?
Yes. This is exactly the same mental state to Mushin and Ichijo of the Zen.
Or, the Selflessness of the Buddhism. —– are they Buddhist ? Not necessary.
[]
Lord Buddha’s teachings = Buddhism, was the wisdom learned from the
human nature, and been applied to the general aspects of the life.
Wisdom in the human nature which was prevailed in the process of extreme
practice was in fact the wisdom held by the universe = Rules of the Universe,
which is in the Buddhist’s term Dharma.
[]
And the contemplation those athletes has gained, is nothing but
their Enlightenment = Being nobody else of the Self, who is in fact Selfless.
= This selflessness is in deed, the Dharma.
___/\___
[]
Pinhole Portrait Picture
Some one might say, they looks like the photos of the earliest (100 KP)
digital camera. —– Oh, com’n they were created by a pretty expensive DSLR
5D, Mk-III you know how much the cost !
(Taken at the Wednesday Workshop in Greenwich)
And the others might say “What a waste of time” = Hours of days of work,
and created this ? —– What for ? ? ? Oh, com’n what’s wrong with you ?
I wanted to show = to be a portrait, what’s the minimum the picture
need to have — or other words, “Enough” to describe the person. 🙂
In fact, it was the same one = Semi-Fisheye, Diopt-Pinhole Hybrid,
Double-density Pinhole. Very very sophisticated Posh system, you know ?
Ha ha ha 😀
[]






























































leave a comment