Cosmos and Hydrangea @ Greenwich Park
While checking the photos I’ve taken this time at Greenwich Park, I went
back to the post I did last year and found that it was one week earlier, yet still
I did shoot almost identical photo then. = not only the tree, some of the plant was
perennial and stayed the same patch, keep flowering with the same face. And the
approach to the same plant is the same = amazingly persistent as the same person.
(It’s mean not much fresh innovation or improvement.) 🙂
Two element homemade lens was the same though, this year I brought
“New” Gordy Lens. (Looks somewhat the same fuzziness, but Gordy Lens
can give close focus. = further background became out of focus ! )
Hydrangea was one week too early and having dry hot weather they looked
a bit withered. = I may come again and change the photos here.
Those heavily fuzzier photos were taken by the Double Density Pinhole.
But those closer images were taken by the Gaudy Lens.
(One more post of Greenwich Flowers would follow.) 🙂
[]
Riot of Colors @ Greenwich Park
Yesterday I went to the Greenwich Park to take picture of Hydrangea. (Its photos
may come next post, though, for the Hydrangea, it was a week too early.)
So, I start with other flowers photo of which I don’t know the name. = some
of the readers must be more knowledgeable about them = I just put the images.
The lens used here was, Homemade Two-element Lens or
Homemade Gaudy Lens on Canon 5D Mk-III.
Be like a fire. I like it.
[]
Forget me not — by Focus Shift (yet again)
Yet again Focus Shift photos — in fact all of those flower photos in the park
were taken in one session, just in a different corner.
The lenses used were either Canon FD 50 mm F1.8 or Canon EFS 18~55 mm IS-II.
The photos which showed closer, hence more out-of-focus bokeh were taken
by 50 mm lens otherwise they were taken by EFS zoom (often on wider setting).
[]
Rhododendron in the Park — by Focus Shift
Long time ago, I was seeing the Rhododendron in the mountain.
Then I saw them in the Kew Garden —– I’m afraid those memories
are getting afar and fading. Now, I’m seeing a bit in a local park,
— may be I should be contented or I need to be thankful that I did
have the struggle to go through gorgeous bush of Rhododendron.
I don’t know why the fragile sister of Rhododendron was named Azarea.
To know about the “Focus Shift” please go to the previous post and the links.
[]
Flower Patch (5) — by 2-Element Homemade Lens (B)
And the lens here was the other one, for Nikon mount type.
on a Canon Eos body but not
the other way round because
the Nikon body (its frange-back
on the Lens mount) is 2.5 mm
thicker = Canon Lens on a Nikon body
can’t have an infinity focus but in the other hand, a mount
converter on Canon for Nikon can have 2.5 mm to play with.
(Photo above, the lens was fitted with Nikon to EOS adapter.)
—– the reason why I further made Nikon type of this lens was,
“I wanted to have this fuzzy image in 32 MP sensor”— serious !
(but the Canon is going to have 50 MP soon, how interesting.
—– Why 200K kind of image needs 20Mb size details ?
= this is THE Paradox — or joke Sir. 😀 )
Those two have a similar structure though, looks very different.
= Nikon type is much smaller still, as its front lens got stronger
curvature, it got stronger distortion. And unlike Canon type,
I didn’t put an Iris (hole in a black-tape) the image has more flair.
—– (for a sake of choice, I left this fuzziness as it is.)
I got quite few lenses which give me sharp image, so it’s nice to have other
choices of the lenses which could create fuzzy, painterly images from subtle
to utterly impressionists painting like one. The beauty of this exercise is,
I don’t need to rely on the tool (so called program) somebody else has made.
My art has to be created by myself and for it, I don’t use a readymade template.
(of cause, I didn’t make 5D camera myself, still some time I do.) Ha ha ha.
[]
Flower Patch (4) — by 2-Element Homemade Lens (A)
There are two “2-Element Homemade Lens” = both were based on the
(supposedly) same toy camera lens (seems to have 27 mm focal length) but
one was using HOYA short-eyesight specs lens to lengthening the focal
length, suits for a full-frame Canon 5D. The other was using a strong concave
lens, came from a discarded zoom’s front element, and I made this for Nikon
(though, for this test, I’ve used it on 5D with “Nikon to EOS” mount adapter.)
As the original lens was designed for focus-free, they are the easiest lens to
use = unlike Pinhole, at least I could see the finder image, still no need to focus
= just click, thanks to the camera’s AV mode. 🙂
And the photos in this post were taken by the HOYA-Canon type.
As focus-free, the lens could capture from quite close range to the distant subject
with very reasonable quality with an added “good” softness and the good deal of
halation which makes me smile with fun. 🙂
(though, I haven’t established whether its softness was the toy camera’s inherent character
or caused by the added lens —– whichever the cause, it wouldn’t spoil my fun.)
And the images made by the toy camera lens (hence, close-up only) was in this post.
[]
Flower Patch (2) — by Anastigmat Lens
The shot from the same flower Patch as before but by the 100 year old
German Anastigmat Lens. There was no fancy operation or trick, but just
click a DSLR Canon 5D on AV mode, while the lens was fully open F5.4.
(Focus was done by a Pentax Helicoid Extension Tube)
On this last picture, there are funny halo on the whitish flowers = almost like
a Focus-Shift or Lens Vibration though they were only a straight shot if not
by a hand blurr (but not likely) —– I’m not sure what caused it. The 100 year
old lens has no crisp image still able to show certain details but nothing more.
[]
Magnolia – 2015 (B)
This Magnolia was an utterly unexpected discoverly. And beyond of my knowledge
and imagination — came from where or if it was a garden variety, how it was
created from which parents ? ? ?
She is a tall tree and the flower is huge = as big as a Magnolia Grandiflora
( even 10″~12″ ) still, flowering long before the leaves was coming out
= closer to the Kobus but not Grandiflora.
In closer look I wonder if they are in fact a kind of invertebrate from the sea ?
—– You know what I feel and that was why I wanted to create fuzzy image. 🙂
Lens used was Canon EF Macro 100mm F2.8 and Tamron 500mm Mirror F8
on Canon 5D Mk-3. (Some fuzzy pictures were taken by Homemade Lens. 🙂 )
[]
Magnolia-2015-(A)
Magnolia here must be a garden variety of Magnolia Kobus, its origin was a Japanese
“Kobushi” (こぶし)which has 6 petals. But I don’t know the Garden Name.
In this post, the photos were taken by a homemade Lens on Tilting Bellows.
And if it was not fuzzy, it was done by the Canon EF Macro 100 mm F2.8.
I still like those fuzzy images. 🙂
[]
Autumn Cherry 2014
In a normal sens, it must be crazy to see the cherry blossom in November.
But this cherry tree is not an ordinary cherry.
= This is the Autumn Cherry which I’ve been photographing every Autumn to
Winter in a past few years. ( I even called her Perpetual Cherry, before. 🙂 )
In the Autumn, when the tree started to change the color, this cherry start to have her
flower bud. Then one or two bleak open. — On the beginning, I just bumped to this flower, and
realized, it was not an accident or fleak, this tree has a fixed program to have winter flowers.
Since then, I also made my custom to visit this tree when I see the season. May be, it is
the similar kind of feeling to see an out wedded daughter come home once a year and find that
she is fine and doing well. (Only a guess as I don’t have any kids. 🙂 )
Those photos were taken by Zeiss 85 mm F1.4 , with and without
“Homemade Ultra heavy Proxer (close-up lens)” on Canon 5D Mk-III.
[]




























































































2 comments