Limit of TRUTH
In the human endeavour to know the TRUTH, there is an amazing parallel between
Nuclear Physics and the Philosophy.
When they came close to the limit, there are unsurpassable barrier and the unknowable.
In the Ontology and the Epistemology front, they come to the same cul-de-sac “Is it really there ? —– How
Do you know ?” —– Isn’t it, you just think it is there ? —– How do yo know, what you are seeing or you
believe, it’s there is true ? —– It might be just a glitch of the electric pulse in the brain. Isn’t it ?
—
Science is an attempt to answer this question. One approach is to increase the number of the observation
and make a statistic assumption ” Since, most of the people saw the same, it can be presumed to be true”
( still, a last person who saw the otherwise, might be seeing the only truth 😀 )
Another approach is to define the object itself ” Whether you can see it or not, this object ( or often the
phenomenon) has so-much-so size and the weight (mass) and behave such and such. And those measurement
has been tested with known objects and always showed its reading was true”
———- Though, when scientists pushed it to the limit, beyond the Newtonian , beyond the Einstein’s
theory, to the Quantum theory —– what they found is utter uncertainty. ” It can be here or there” and
now even the time scale becoming not certain. ” It is here at moment, but in the same time it might exist
in the future as the same thing ( You are happened to be here, but in the same time somewhere else or
might be in a past or in a future, as exactly as you are)
—-
There is a phenomenon called diffraction in the behaviour of the wave. Water wave, sound wave even
the light wave —– when a wave go through narrow gap, the wave spread to the both side of the gap.
When a wave go through two ( or more ) gaps, the spread patterns of the wave create moire pattern.
In a case of the light, the pattern is bright and dark band and the distance between the bright band is
depend on the wave length and the distance of the gaps. (X-lay crystallography is using this effect —–
indirectly measuring the size of the gaps and direction = distance of the atoms and their alignments )
And when a scientist tested this with just one photon, he still saw the moire pattern. Its mean
one photon could pass two gaps in the same moment and showed the diffraction at two gaps—– how ? ? ?
It was a dramatic display of the Quantum behavior of the light and the proof of the theory —— though,
it showed no clear-cut truth of the world, but showed the uncertain nature of the nature.
Even more bizarre fact is if two electronic detectors were placed behind of two gaps, only one photon was
detected either of one gap. — depend on how it was observed, the same phenomenon was seen differently.
In other words, no absolute truth can be existing.
—– Strangely you may think though, all those advancement of the science is owing to virtually just one
advancement of the electronics, the design of so-called OP amp / instrumentation amp.
Whether a detector is photo sensor or current sensor, when the more amplification was enabled, the more
faint signal can be detected (while eliminating or canceling the nose)—– hence even smaller particles
or minute change can be detected.
The trouble is, even if we are capturing the effect of just single photon or semi-particle though, as it was read
as an electronic signal, nobody knows whether they are really solid particles or just a vortex of the energy.
Far from proving the fundamental of the matter / existences / Dharma, it made the situation even worse.
—
Well known expression in the Mahayana Buddhism ” Exists as not exists” —– My understanding of this
expression is, It is the way to express the phenomena in our feeling in the subconsciousness. —– we feel
it is there though as it is in the subconscious, it is invisible and out of conscious, hence not there.
But before I came to this understanding, I thought, Buddha had an incredible insight to know the Quantum
nature of the Dharma. May be, but not likely —– so, some says, Buddha must come from the outer-space,
from the another universe where having far more advanced civilization though, I wouldn’t jump a gun.
Even with the advancement of the science and the technology, we came no way closer to the truth,
far from it, What we found is the definite uncertainty of the TRUTH.
So, this must be the reason why Buddha kept his silence as it is unknowable. And no use to us.
—– So that, I’m more interested in the tendency of the coincidences, which is out of the science 🙂
___/\___
—
Starting Point of BUDDHISM / Enlightenment
Well well well, this blog is coming to exactly the one year since its started.
So, I should write something very fundamental. This is the final piece of the jig-saw.
——————–
Unlike any another religion, the Buddhism doesn’t have a myth or the story of the creation.
Since, long before the existence of the human being, long long before the arrival of Buddha,
the Dharma exist from the beginning. Nobody know why. ( Ask scientists. They don’t know neither. 😀 )
As Buddha had absolute faith and the respect to the Dharma, he refused to give even his
interpretation of it, since it is unknowable to the human being and made up a story is
nothing but a disrespect and a treachery to the Creator / Dharma.
Therefore the Buddhism has to start from here “to unconditionally accept the one’s existence ( as he
or she ) as it is, and to see own existence as a part of the Dharma”.
Therefore, to give a person’s own interpretation as a thought of the self, is nothing but an arrogant trespass.
Since, the self is not definable by the person but only by the Dharma.
——————–
If anybody having an understanding, that the Buddhism deny the self, it is utterly wrong.
A person here is the Noble creation of the Dharma, hence, try to give own interpretation or definition of it, is
a transgression, therefore such thought has to be denied. ——– (Denying the thought of self, not
the awareness of the self itself) ——- In metaphor, ” Appear in person, not by a photograph ”
(a Copy or Made up Description is not Yourself / its your wishful or distorted imagination)
The person’s Imaginary Self is a delusion, its got to be in flesh as it was created and it is keep changing.
So that, to live as the True Yourself, not as an imaginary fixed self, is the key.
And this is the meaning of ” To live in MUSHIN ” and Just Do It, Just Live.
So, this is the starting point of the Buddhism, and its goal. ( Very simple and easy isn’t it 😀 )
———- This is the reason, why it is so simple and ubiquitous like as a dog sit, but as difficult as
making the people puzzling 2500 years. ( People has been expecting to see glorious secret, Holy Grail 😀 )
As long as a person is puzzling, while expecting to find something over there, it is not the Buddhism and
far away from the Enlightenment. Enlightenment is within yourself——- as where the Dharma is.
And when the person abandoned such attempt and start to just live ——- is the Enlightenment.
——————–
But, to learn the way to accept and just do it, the person may need to practice repeating practice.
( I’ve fully explained its effect and the psychological mechanism in the past blog posts —–Please refer them )
Direct Transmission
Direct transmission is the way to communicate using purely in one’s sensory and put the signal
straight into one’s subconscious / old layer of the data process system, without relying on the word / notion.
(Though this signal can be just a sign. And this sign trigger the feeling, dormant memory in the spirit).
Especially if the subject is too ambiguous or too complexed, too big to convert to the notion or
even the word is not existing.——( like a word / notion of Subconscious in the time of Buddha )
Buddhism is the teachings, challenged to tackle such subject, Dharma.
Superficially the meaning of the Dharma has been explained though, it contains too many meanings
and notions therefore too complexed to define, and its deep meaning in its totality is almost unknowable.
Still, funnily enough, it’s everywhere, hence it is on front of you as everybody is seeing it
and you are a part of it. This is not an invisible Atomic Sub-particle’s theory.
So that the Buddhist spend hundreds of years to analyzing and trying to define it, resulting the
mountain of Abidharma Mantras.
——————–
Buddha himself didn’t explain it, since it is on front of our eyes and can be seen by anybody, yet
unexplainable by the words.—–And make the people to discover its deep meaning by themselves
through the practice, is what he was teaching.———-There was, and still is, no short cut.
So that, the famous ” Flower Summon ” comes in, ( though, this story only appeared in the
Chinese Mantra ——since they are pretty good in this kind of symbolic expression originated
from the Taoism, such as the huge blanc space express the rich notion of “Wu” (Mu in Japanese))
———- if you see the Dharma there, this is the Dharma what Buddha meant.
( If you see ” Oh, Master, you decapitated poor flower. You killed it”——– you see a dead flower. 😀 )
———- It is like your stomach up-set. You know it but you can’t explain exactly what it is in the word.
And only the other who got the same, may know it. So, to know it you have to bite onion, plenty of it.
( In Zen term, blanc white paper may be the expression of the whole Universe,—- or Nothing.
Therefore “Noting” can be the whole existence / the Dharma )——so that,
a small room in the Vimarakirti’s house can accommodate 3000 bikkus. )
leave a comment