Three times BUDDHA
There is an interesting story in the Agama Sutra
(of Buddhism ! = there are many.) —– one day,
Lord Buddha met a horse trainer (other versin said Village Chief).
Then asked to the horse-trainer “How to teach a horse ?”
Horse-trainer replied that there are three ways to teach horse.
Gentle way, Hard way and Gentle / Hard mixed.
Lord Buddha asked him further “If all three ways failed,
what do you do with that horse ?”
The trainer answered “Kill the horse” and he asked back
“How you teach your follower ?”.
Lord Buddha answered him, “There are three ways to teach,
Gentle way, Hard way and Gentle / Hard mixed, but if all
those teachings failed, kill him”.
Hose-trainer was horrified and shouted “You been telling us Don’t kill,
how dear you kill the follower ?”
Lord Buddha smiled back “Well, I just stop talk to him.
Completely stop talk, is the same to deny his existence,
same as to kill him, isn’t it ?”
[]
This episode sound like just a casual funny story though,
this was the episode which gave the most important clue to the
so-called “Unanswered Questions” You must be realized that
Lord Buddha’s No-answer was not just a rack of word but it
was the massage as strong as to kill the person !
[]
There is an often used phrase in Japanese “Even Buddha tolerates till
three times” (Hotoke no kao mo sando made. 仏の顏も三度まで)
—– I didn’t know, this phrase was in deed, originated from the Scripture.
—– And this story showed rather realistic attitude of
Lord Buddha, contrary to the popular belief, he was not a
bottomlessly gentle and kind teacher. As once a hard-core
austere, he was not an optimistic person, as he defined what
the life is, such as in the Four Noble Truth.
From here, in a process to idealize and idolize him, even worse,
to fabricate many so-called Buddha in Mahayana Buddhism,
( in fact, it was the mix-up with Tantrism and Hinduism )
crux of the original teachings was lost.
[]
What Lord Buddha himself taught was, to have the Detached Eyes.
Detached Eyes mean, detached from the Mind / Emotion, hence there
was neither attachment to the subject or person. In other words,
there was no attachment even to his followers. Hence, as long as
Lord Buddha committed to give guidance to the person, he was in deed
committed it to 100% (and try to teach in three different ways) though
if it was failed, he literally ex-communicated the person.
Once excommunicated, the person became invisible.
Even visually saw the person, it wouldn’t connected to any
emotional memories, hence there were no anger or feeling of
disappointment etc. —– Because of there are nothing to cling
past Mind / Emotion, only the matter is what on front of eyes,
on its very Moment. (This IS the very Zen mind-set)
(After you practised long enough, and gained this condition / Mind-set
then you know what Detached Eyes and Detached Mind can help you.)
(And how to practice to gain Detachment, please read the post under a
category of [Lemon Zen] in the right column.
[]
You may feel, it’s sound very cruel and not-Buddhist like,
it’s because So-called monk or teacher is not really understood, or only
making diplomatic smile and pretending to be friendly, in order to
sell to the mass.
Because of this confusion, one of the greatest novelist, Soseki Natsume
described it in his book, [Mon (門) / Gate], when a priest of Zen temple
has told to him, “Mind of Zen is Hijo (非情) / No Emotion” he felt even
alienated. —– (To describe Mushin (無心) / Mind of No-Mind, this
priest used more realistic word Hijo in stead, because he knew the
Zen Buddhism deeper, and didn’t mind to sell it to the mass.)
[]
Load Buddha didn’t give his teachings to give false optimism,
or fancy dream but the Truth.
In this aspect, he was quite harsh. Telling the followers to get rid of
their possessions even their family (little consideration to an agony of
the family left behind, not mention to his own Royal lineage).
(This was the reason why
Lord Buddha bared the women to join his follower’s sanga.
Since, to a woman, to abandon the child is out of question in the
first place = woman may have conflict to follow his teachings.)
[]
—– Still, with detached eyes and the mind, there wouldn’t be
any matter left to worry about, because the psychological
source of worry = emotion itself had been already detached.
The mechanism to feel any suffering has no longer exists.
= Peace of mind ! 😀
—– though, I’m not an enlightened man, hence mixed with
failed person and teasing them or teased by them are fun.
This is what the Life is. Ha ha ha 😀
___/\___
[]
[…] a post [Three times Buddha] there could be a fixed attitude […]
[…] “Completely stop speaking is same as to kill the person” ) […]
[…] I described it in the post [Three times Buddha] […]
[…] or just to give a smile, otherwise (if you can’t get it), the excommunication. […]
“Completely stop to talk” would mean to completely stop moving and begin talking to someone. i think you meant to say “stop talking to completely ” im sorry but your english is very confusing
Original script was in English (in the Net) = may be it was my miss-memory.
—– You are right, that wording could mean like that.
When I was smoking, years ago, I was making an excuse, “The government saying
that “Smoking seriously harms you —” therefore, I never smoke seriously.
I’m a casual smoker”= So, it would be OK” 😀
so the Buddha’s main teaching was to embrace dissacociative personality disorder? that does not sound very healthy
Did I write “dissacociative” — ? ? ? What this word mean ?
Dis-associative ?
I need to read the post again still, my point was that he was not
a bottomless kind man = when he thought it was right, he was quite harsh.
(Lord Buddha told a mentally handicapped Churi Bantak to sweep the garden
while other disciples was allowed for sitting to listen his teachings. =
today’s activist may say, politically incorrect discrimination !)
Thank you for commenting here.
[…] the delusions. (Therefore he completely ignored to answer […]
[…] Whether you believe or not, I’ve completely forgotten the existence of Double Density Pinhole. I should insist, this was not a demented memory but the Zen No-mind. 🙂 —– Zen only deals with the things on front = if not on front, it is not exists, since the mind is not clinging the No-existent things. […]
[…] There are many stories of Buddha’s silence or No-answer. All those questions which was ignored were about the imaginary things, such as infinity, eternal, after a death, perpetual soul kind. Because all those are the imaginary things = deluded by the “Self” which is not even exists. Why bother answer it. In fact, Lord Buddha’s silence = stop talking meant to be a message as strong as to kill the person. […]
[…] I read through Agama, only those two episode caught my eyes = My intuition told me Yes this is it. They gave me the key to decipher what the teachings of […]
[…] 「まるで仏教者らしからぬ言葉ですね」と言うので「仏教が底無しの慈悲などを語っていると思っていたらひどい誤解で 釈尊自身、人を殺しかねない程の厳しさで教えを施していたのです。 つまりそれは甘い慈悲などと言うものではなく本人自身で答を見つける為の鍵でしかなかった。 しかも三回教えても見込無しとなったらそれまでとつっ放されていたのです。 慈悲とか極樂を語っていたら、それは釈尊の教えとは何の関係もありません。」 […]