It’s the same landscape = just outside of my kitchen. Only a difference was a Wood Pigeon suddenly appeared on a tree started to tell me that this is his territory. (This photo was taken by a Zeiss EF 1.8 / 55 mm lens on Sony A7R —– though I wasn’t so impressed by this lens or the camera’s control. Camera tried to find the focus FOR ME without knowing whether it was a bird or tree branch, let alone which is the subject I was aiming = so, hunting here and there again and again while setting focusing area too wide. = Fixing it to the center is much better and don’t ask me to adjust each time. —– In fact, I should have used much smaller F-aperture though, it’s no point to test the lens stopped down. 😀 )
Any how, if it was a birds shot, why not use my old friend Tamron 500 mm lens.
Considering it was a hand-held shot through a dusty double-grazed window grass, it wasn’t too bad. (I wanted to capture the moment when he chirp, with a mouth wide opened though, it was always too late. —– We need to click a shutter a moment before he chirp. Only a trouble was, how do we know it beforehand. 😀 )
This is a screen shot of the next photo using Double Density Pinhole on A7R camera.
This is the original straight shot on Nikon D810. (cropped image)
This was the straight shot on Nikon D810 by Zeiss 18mm lens as a comparison.
The same sky by the Fun camera Lens (though not on the same moment = I was doing those shots next by next).
A shot by the DD-Pinhole — in fact, this was the last one of those photos on the morning.
Shot by the X4 Pinholes with wide adapter attached.
X4 Pinholes image again. (without wide adapter)
Yet another X4 Pinholes image.
Just a casual click on the kitchen window — only for a fun. 😀 —– but I like this !
Kobus (Japanese name Kobushi mean fist) originated northern Japan, but this pink variety might be made in here. (I hope it was done by the simple crossbreeding, not by the heavy manipulation of chromosome or gene, unlike the blue roses and green chrysanthemum kind. === We are over-stepping too far.)
(Those above three photos were done by the Sony E 30mm lens)
Not all the Double-density Pinhole is the same — far from it, very different each other and very difficult to control. This one may suit for more mixed color, large patterned subjects. (not this one. 😀 ) — It seems, Sony A7 changes process if the size of hole changes (when the amount of image data changes) = strangely, the larger hole makes sharper image ! — May be a conflict with their Noise reduction process (small detail might be wiped out presumed as the noises, hence this plasticky image ! —– Sony or Minolta try to sell the image what they thought Ideal. From the same DD Pinhole, the images made by Nikon and Canon were different. )
Often the multi pinhole together with shake by the window creates good fun.
Local people must think, what a hell that guy doing over and over again. 😀
(Or they might be thinking that on the spring, all the idiot comes out. = As today is the Spring Equinox.)
The photos here were taken by the DD-Pinhole with a LED ring-light. Pinhole mean, there is no grass optics which may block the light of shorter wave length (Blue to UV) and the LED used were very cool day-light type (recycled from a discarded cheap work light — there is a high quality LED which got exact 5500°K but with the cost) = resulting to produce very blueish photos. (I should have set the camera’s White balance to somewhat 8000°K in advance)
You may say, they are not pretty sweet kind but more likely a Goth taste !
I agree, but, is there anything wrong ? Ha ha ha. 😀
Nevertheless, I like this approach / technique. Anyway, the photography chose the subject. If it doesn’t, it mean, it IS a kind of general photography, not worth bothering to. —– if you say, there are numerous impressive photos in the field of general photography —– Are they ? If you look it again, you will realize, it is impressive because the subject WAS impressive = not the photo. Photo was just a good copy of such subject. Nothing else. = you can send a robot to do a copy. = It is not a photography but a listing up, curation of the subjects. There is an occasion, as if the subject was almost placed there to be photographed. Photography is a very heavy activity in the life.
Well, they were yet another template like photos — fuzzy cherry flowers, this time created by the homemade Mag-Lens.
Don’t worry it wouldn’t cause any infringement of the copyright law. 😀
It supposed to make fragile flowers even more soft though, strangely, it made flowers looks somewhat like a ceramic craft. —– ? Are my eyes got something wrong ?
Suddenly many flowers started to open. (The above seems to be a Plum flowers) — So, I’m capturing them with a lots of lenses (?) — above, by Sony E 3.5 30mm Macro.
This is rather early though, Somei-yoshino Cherry by Sony lens.
And this year again, the early Magnolia by Sony lens.
The same flower by homemade Mag-lens.
Yet another shot by the Double-density Pinhole.
The same flower by the same DD-Pinhole but with LED lighting.
Cherry flowers by Sony Macro lens = straight shot.
Then by the Mag-lens.
A bit too messy though, by the DD-Pinhole. (Being as a Pinhole which is pan-focus, messy back grownd become very prominent.)
So, how about with added LED Ring-light. (Hoping the back mess going into the dark)
By the Mag-lens. (Only the far back grownd showing funny coma aberration.)
By the DD-Pinhole.
DD-Pinhole with LED Ring-light. Good evening Sir.
And they are the Lenses(?) and the camera — Sony A7R with E 3.5 30mm Macro, DD-Pinhole and a homemade Mag-lens (A lens originally from a magnifier, mounted into a lens barrel from other compact camera = equivalent of 40mm F2.4)
Well, this is an extra addition = Yama-zakura (see its brownish leaves come out with the flowers) taken by the Fun camera lens.
It was a funny shopping. I found this lens in a local junk shop without the camera. (The camera might have gone with a standard kit Zoom. — I didn’t ask.) Situation was odd and the price was even more odd. = so, I bought it without knowing about this lens. (Even for the same Sony E-mount, the lens could be for cropped image size = may not cover full format. — Funnily enough, when I checked the test shot image on my PC, the lens data said “35 mm camera equivalent of 45 mm” ! = Its mean, the lens was designed for a small format still, it can cover full frame.) 30 mm lens for full frame is rather wide-angle. And a 1:1 (x1) macro mean, the closest distance will be too close to the lens front = as I found it in deed.
Sony put a deceptive decoration to cover-up the very small lens (only 14mm size)
While appreciate the use of 90 mm Tamron Macro or 100 mm Canon EF Macro (instead of Nikon 55 mm Macro), I’m not keen to use this lens for x1 macro shot as the lens front will touch the subject, in the same time, it will cover the subject under the shadow. = (Have to use an awkward side light.)
Nevertheless, the optical quality of the lens wasn’t too bad. But on practice, with the Sony A7 camera, I wouldn’t give a word of appreciation. The focus was very quiet though, it was not stable = always hunting forward, backward, forward again kind. And even worse, it was not easy to use in manual focus. The finder displays funny focused position indicator though, each time, it goes back to the far position. What a nightmare. And the manual focusing ring is not very responsive (rather slow and remote = it seems, the motor is driving the focus even with manual use, and worse still, the controlling soft try to interfere too much (Sony might say “Offering the assistance” — such as, while try to focus manually, the finder image changes to magnified image = suddenly, and erratically ! = Think, when we shoot a busy insect on the flower, in the next moment, insect may have moved, and the hand changed the position. = I’m sure, the person who developed this system never had a field test. = only tested the camera on the optical bench.
Nevertheless, it worked well for the general subject. (At moment this is only an autofocus lens on my Sony A7 camera I wouldn’t complain, considering the money I have paid.) 😀
The lens got quite smooth character, showing very little aberration = good sharpness even when F was fully open, still, with soft, out of focus bokeh. —– But, what so ever the excuse, couldn’t they design anything better ? Forget a fish-tin like slippery guise, give it more functional better grip.
He said to be a hard-core original member of the heavy metal Metalica.
Though, long time he had been confined in a box in my place. As a hard iron man, without having a high voltage power he couldn’t play a single note nor even just shake his body. (The story behind was, that a part of stock taking, I need to document and Video my kinetic works. But a trouble was, that I couldn’t find the electronic controller of this man.) — As seen on the photo, he was a man on the stage standing alone = just an empty wire work. — So, how he could play music let alone move his body, as there is no mechanism or trick was seen on the stage. Well, that IS the ingenious part of producing him. = He play a music with the resonance. = Tune himself to the vive and excite himself. (The base, stage vibrates almost invisible mode. Then his wobbly body resonate and amplify the movement, so start to shake, following the resonating frequency. Acoustically or mechanically, his body is very complexed = depend on the resonating frequency, he vibrates different way — and his heavy instrument got rather large inertia and makes own vibration.) The reason why I haven’t done this video making was that I wanted to compile it with metal music — how to synchronize the beat and the body movement etc etc, not mention the trouble with music copyright.
As I wrote on the beginning of the previous post, that the Matter all about Buddhism is The Mind.
But, on this moment, forget about whether the Mind exists or not, can it remain after the death or not, kind of argument. (It seemed, that the writer of Mahayana scriptures made the matter too grand and ostentatious — don’t exaggerate too much. (= It’s a bad habit of the Indian scholar) It’s just the matter of the Mind and Heart Sir.) So, just think of your own Mind. We all know, that there are two kind of mind in our brain. One feels and often perplexed in a depth of our mind (often called your Heart) and the other is thinking a logical answer while giving complicated consideration or justifying excuse. The former was generated from the old part of the brain, called Lymbic system. And the other from the brain’s new cortex. Sound strange though, the neuro scientist found that we are first thinking deep in our subconscious, then convert it to cognitive (in lexical) form second later. So, technically, the former can be the first impression or your feeling and the later is the Second thought or Consideration. This mechanism appeared when we see, hear, taste — 5 senses = feel it, then categorize, name it or describe it. So, this Second thought has been given a Consideration (while referring to the data-bank) or Judgement whether it was for an answer of Yes or No = like, you have seen it or didn’t see it.
—– But here is a trouble, you might have thought, that you saw it — Did you ? How you ARE shure. Even if it was there, next moment, the projector was switched off or changed to the next image or the person is dead. So, the Buddhism advise you, don’t cling your thought or hard judgement of Yes or No. Leave the matter to your first impression. Neither Yes or No, but your intuitive observation = This IS the Middle way. Not between the Yes or NO, but your own initial intuition. Because the whole Dharma is moving and keep changing = try to define it in a fixed form is nothing but the our delusion, since the Dharma itself IS VOID. In fact we too. (Though, I wouldn’t guaranty your debt disappear on the next moment or your wife let you free tomorrow. —– World may look the same.
So, don’t ask me what is the point to become a Buddhist. 😀 )
What all about Buddhism, the matter is “How our Mind works” no more no less.
To Lord Buddha himself, its source was our mind itself. Lord Buddha observed the activity and its tendency of his own mind, and the mind of the others as well. But, priory to the matter of Mind, Lord Buddha discovered the mechanism of the Dharma, and its entwined activity of the Karma. In the first glance, the Mind looked work in the same principle of the Karma though, there are some peculiar tendency in the activity of the Mind. Generally, the Dharma works according to the mechanism of the Karma, though, the Mind does not necessary follow the Karma.
When we see, the Mind may see but may not see. Seeing and recognise it, is not the same activity. Even if we didn’t see, we may still recognise it. Its mean, the existences of the Dharma may be the same. It may be there but may not be there. The constant change in the moment to moment makes the situation even worse. We can define, it’s there or it’s not there though, the truth seems not the matter of what we define still, we know the state of it by our intuition or subconsciousness = It’s there as it is. But, we can not see this cognition, because it is in our dark subconscious = it’s there but not there. Therefore, the form is no different from the Void. Void is no different from the form. See the world in this eyes, is the Middle way. And because the world is exists in this way, It IS the VOID.
The meaning of the night walk described in the post “Test of selflessness” was —– The followers followed Lord Buddha without ask why or what for = without having any lexical cognition. Completely Selfless and Open minded = not imposing their own definition or seek an answer but accept the situation (walk on the rainy night) as it is = without going into the mind-game / Why, but just take a walk —– This selfless mind is in the Middle way and accept the Dharma in such a way is to see its Void. To gain the eyes of middle way, the followers became free from the wrong idea and start to see and live as the own (as it is). To be as the own mean to be with Dharma.