(Dirty) Battle on the Net
With a stereotypical crèche, we are implanted a myth that we are
bombarded by too much information in the net environment.
And we can find ANY info’ by just clicking.
—– DO you believe this ? —– As a matter of fact I did too.
So, as my tablet as a mobile photo book, I’ve been explaining to
the new friends what I’m doing and told them “If you are
interested in, just read the blog itself. And to find my blog, the
easiest way is just google < yoshi, Zappa> you can see this fish-eye
photo of Zappa and the links to my blog on top of the google page”
= So far it was a good instruction — I thought till few weeks ago.
Then I met the same man and he said “I couldn’t find your blog”
— ? ? ? = We realized that, (as he was using a browser MS’s
Internet Explorer and its search engine Bing) on IE the information
related to Google were completely missing.
= On Bing, you can NOT find any WordPress blog, such as a search
term, not only <yoshi, Zappa> even <yoshizen blog> NO information
of my blog coming up there at all. (even after 10th pages)
Since I don’t like bullying MS (with their monopoly), I’ve been using
Fire Fox from the start, therefore I was not aware this trouble.
(You can test this easily = You see the Search box in the Tool Bar
on top of screen. When you move the Arrow there, The choice of
Search Engine, Yahoo, Bing etc will appears = Try each of them
with the Same Search Term)
Obviously, MS is so desperate when facing their fortune is
slipping away = try to destruct Google in any mean.
(They haven’t reached the Point “If you can’t beat, join them” yet.)
It’s an ugly battle going on.
(Incidentally, I found that to search through the browser Opera was
not recognized by the WordPress = the count of the reading of the post
was not appeared to the WP statistics. — I have no idea why.
= I noticed this, when a man told me that he has read through all the
“Photography post” which got enormous number — still, nothing
appeared on the WP stats count. Then I found he was using Opera.)
(Later, I tested the Opera my self while downloading it to my PC and
found = its depend on the condition when it was downloaded = sometime
work, other time not — try download again and check the function)
= It seems, strange battle is also going on behind the scene. 😀
(There must be the heavy negotiation of license, money etc etc)
.
Prince William on Gay Magazine

After the discussion, HRH The Duke of Cambridge made the following statement:
“No one should be bullied for their sexuality or any other reason and no one
should have to put up with the kind of hate that these young people have endured
in their lives. The young gay, lesbian and transgender individuals I met through
Attitude are truly brave to speak out and to give hope to people who are going
through terrible bullying right now. Their sense of strength and optimism should
give us all encouragement to stand up to bullying wherever we see it.
What I would say to any young person reading this who’s being bullied for their
sexuality: don’t put up with it – speak to a trusted adult, a friend, a teacher,
Childline, Diana Award or some other service and get the help you need.
You should be proud of the person you are and you have nothing to be ashamed of.”
Attitude editor Matthew Todd says: “During my time as editor of Attitude I have met
parents whose child has taken or lost their life after being bullied for being LGBT+
or just perceived to be LGBT. I am very happy that the future King of the
United Kingdom agrees this must stop and I would urge parents in particular to
raise their voices in their communities to ensure that every school protects
– really protects – all children.”
This issue of Attitude magazine went to press on Wednesday 8 June, just days
before the devastating shooting in Orlando which saw 49 LGBT+ people lose their lives.
Attitude sends our most heartfelt condolences to those affected by this atrocity.
Around the world, LGBT+ people experience hatred and violence every day.
Such violence does not exist in a vacuum but snowballs from intolerance and bullying
that begins in classrooms, too often comes from politicians or religious leaders and
is often not treated with respect by the media.
——————————————–
What Buddha taught ?
When we try to find what was the original teachings of
Lord Buddha among the millions line of scripture, we have
to pay the most heavy attention to the personality of
Lord Buddha as an individual human being in his totality, while
chiselling out all the mixed-ups and the glorifying decorations.
(If the scripture had Hindu name, it is not Buddhism, or the
story has supernatural magnificence it was just a fantasy.)
—– there could be a gradual change of his view and the opinion
still, there couldn’t be an utter contradiction from the same person.
Since he got his Enlightenment (with his own understanding of the
world) after he seceded from ascetic monks/Guru’s group (with a
disappointment and a lost hope to find a viable answer from them
and such ascetic approach) therefore his idea couldn’t be anything
like a transcendental oracle like fanatic words (so-called
mumbo-jumbo) but frank and down to the earth straight idea.
[]
Typically like Four Noble Truth, those very brunt and blatant words
were the words of cool realist.
If the person was a kind of salesman, he would have chosen much
sweeter words and even a misleading bait in it (such as a promise
of Heaven). But
Lord Buddha was not a spin-doctor but rather like a rational scientist,
he talked the facts and phenomena, not his speculation or fantasy —
its mean his teachings were not an idealistic Dogma but the wisdoms
based on the facts and the scientific observations.
= in this approach, he found the mechanism of Karma and able to see
the effect of the time in moment to moment flaw. So that, to find
the NO Perpetual Soul (Anatman) was a straight conclusion.
(That’s why in his Sangha, there was no Cast = curse from the past)
Those observations and the understandings needs no special filter to
see = they are the common facts, and from those observations anybody
who acquired the right eyes can see and find the truth behind
( 8 right ways meant this) and see the Enlightenment. That was why,
Lord Buddha gave the last instruction on his death bed
“Don’t believe what was said but see/learn it yourself” = this word
clearly indicates that the teachings were not a Dogma to memorise
but the Direct Transmission =
wisdom which could be learned from the observation of Facts.
[]
And Lord Buddha’s observation went into deep inside of the
human psych = subconsciousness too.
He realised that we are able to see and know the subject
without us thinking it. (So-called intuition)
And he thought this is the Manifestation of the Dharma in us.
(We can walk without thinking how to walk — so,
WHO made us to walk ? = It must be the Dharma !
But being in our subconscious, even we know it’s there though
we can not see = It is there and/but It is not there. (There must
be a big debate about “Self / Soul, the subject / who is thinking, =
the person who is thinking IS WHOM ? Though, as
Lord Buddha took the stance that there is no Self / Atman = talking
this subject IS effectively a recognition of the existence of the Self =
So, how it was debated was very interesting but we may not know.
—– still from the Scripture we can see the description “Giving
without aware of giving IS the true giving” = we can guess what
was taught there then. And from here, (if Self exists or not) the
debate extended —> Does Dharma exists or itself is Void ? ? ?
And in this context, an episode in the Agama sutra was the
story which gave us the most crucial insight.
= That was the true record of
Lord Buddha’s teachings.
___/\___
.
Core of the Buddhism
Did Buddhism asked the followers to remember any special notion,
something like a rule of the “Preservation of Energy” in physics or
a special formula, or to do very peculiar practice ? (Don’t mix-up
with a funny ritualistic practice of Tantra sect.
Or their magic Mantra (Dharani) which was claimed to have a
supernatural power. — They are noting to do with the teachings of
Lord Buddha.)
.
—– Such as Four Noble Truth = they are only a bit deeper
understanding of the phenomena in our life general.
= After all, what the Buddhism telling us were the Awareness
toward our own existence. Which is not far from our
common sense = Because all of us ARE existing more or less on
the same bases = Nobody was born to live for ever, nor born
with the wings to fly etc etc = nobody is superman, or
divine figure in flesh —– as no supernatural facts exists (other
than silly delusion or rumour) there couldn’t be any possibility
of the fantastic fabrication mixed into the Buddhism teachings.
(In deed, there are mountain of fancy stories = but they ARE
the fancy stories = nothing to do with the teachings.
— It’s a fun to see a fancy imagination of the people.) 😀
[]
Lord Buddha denied any idealistic notions as they are only
the delusions. (Therefore he completely ignored to answer
(completely stop to talk the person is the same to kill him)
the questions about “after the life” or about the “universe”
which is neither exists nor possible to know.
—– Considering the both subjects are the easiest topics to tell a
fabrication or a fancy story (because, to counter prove its fancy
story is even harder — Try to prove there are Heaven and Hell.
Then try disprove them. You will see it’s a waste of time = so that,
Lord Buddha completely ignored it. )
Probably the most important key to decipher Buddhism teachings
are in the story of Kisa Gotami (Running around the village) =
as a typical Upaya teaching, there was no verbal teaching but the
learning by the practice = Direct transmission to the subconscious.
= No lexical Notion/Idea or Thinking process.
And this phenomenon was also significant in this story.
—– Why it’s significant = because its phenomenon of
“Exists but Exists Not” character of the Subconsciousness
and this phenomenon is the core of the Voidness.
Dharma IS here or HERE all together IS the Dharma though,
since its detail is constantly changing moment to moment because
the Karma is active, it couldn’t be defined in one shape, still it IS
the Dharma. = This “Exists yet Exists not” character is parallel to
our subconsciousness. = And this IS what we ARE = and to
become aware this fact IS the Enlightenment.
(So, effectively it IS no difference to know who I AM = just
I am as I am. = That’s why, it is a Dog shit.) 😀
___/\___
.
The same Meadow by 2 Element Toy Lens

Somewhat the same kind of photos again.
But with 2 Element Toy camera Lens.











This lens can make a bit more detailed image than Gaudy Lens. 🙂
.
It’s the Gaudy Lens

I developped 10s of devices/lenses to obtain painting like fuzzy effect
— and so far this gaudy lens seemed to be the best device for the job.
No filter or attachment available on the market nor digital
manipuration can make the same effect.
(simplly nobody else needed => no manifacturer wanted to make)

So, I’m enjoying a dance alone in the middle of nowhere. 😀








The best things of this gaudy lens is, its balance of fuzzyness
and the ability to retain a certain details of the image.
(In fact, I can controle it by the size of paper hole/iris and
the amount of over-exposure/halation = so, it is not
like a wild animal of DD-Pinhole) Ha ha ha 😀
.
Lens (?) Comparison
Photo above was the picture taken by the “Twisted Lens”

Gaudy Lens
The same flower meadow was taken by the “Gaudy Lens”
for the comparison of Fuzzy effect.

2 Element Toy Lens
Effect looks very similar to Gaudy Lens though, this
is a lens originated from a Toy camera + added
concave lens on front (= effectively a Retrofocus structure)
— advantage of this lens is its omuni-focus design.

Double Density Pinhole
And this one was taken by the Double Density Pinhole.

Mono-Pinhole
But this one was by the simple Mono-Pinhole.

Tri-Pinholes
Then, how about Tri-Pinhole ! 🙂

Double Density Pinhole
Different angles by the DD-Pinhole.

Double Density Pinhole
This photo showes the flowers in the green, between the houses.
= nothing special.
[]
Meadow by Twisted Lens

This was the first field test of the so-called
Twisted Lens = Two convex lenses stacked on a bellows.
As the lens was on a bellows they were easily
re-positioned = so, the effect of blur was adjusted.








As the lens was on the bellows, they were rather awkward
to use, nevertheless it managed to produce the photos.
You might wonder why I fuss about such fuzzy images =
The reason is, in our eyes we may not seeing sharp clear
images — they might be the brain re-constructed image.
(Remember, we never see straight line with rownd eye balls
— straight line IS the re-construction in the brain)
That’s why we are surprised and impressed by the sharp
clear photos, same as when we see a detailed close-up
photo of an insect which we can’t see otherwise.
[]
2 comments